Launch of the UK Research Collaborative

Sasha

Fine, thank you
Messages
17,863
Likes
34,218
Location
UK
That's a great piece from ME Research UK, thanks, Sasha. And of course, the UK Respiratory Research Collaborative that enjoyed so much success was set up by Stephen Holgate too.

Yes - he's said that that was his motivation for getting an ME one off the ground. A ten-fold increase in funding would be great! :)
 

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,559
Likes
28,261
UK CFS/M.E. Research Collaborative Executive Board
Teleconference meeting
Summary of discussion
19 July 2013

Minutes of recent executive (teleconference) meeting:
http://www.actionforme.org.uk/Resources/Action for ME/Documents/get-informed/CMRC-190713.pdf.pdf
Two points of interest to me in this:

4. Executive Board Membership
It was agreed to invite BACME (British Association for CFS/ME – a multidisciplinary membership organisation for clinicians) to join as an Observing member of the Executive Board. This would ensure that a direct link with clinicians and the work of BACME is maintained. Further benefits include supporting the participation of people with M.E. in research projects, disseminating outcomes from research and enhancing the potential for further collaboration.
A bit nervous about this given you have to support the NICE guidelines/similar to be a member of BACME.

There were already clinicians from the NHS on the executive board so unsure if this was necessary.

Anyway, who knows, perhaps I have been looking too much on the negative and it could be beneficial.


7. Annual conference

It was agreed to hold annual conferences and a sub-committee will be established with people nominating themselves for involvement to SH within the next week. JM will coordinate the first meeting as the MRC have committed to support this initiative and link it with an agreed forum for researchers funded through the MRC.
I could imagine this conference will have a mix of research incl. some psychobabble. So again have mixed feelings about it.
 

Bob

Senior Member
Messages
16,455
Likes
34,055
Location
England (south coast)
Discussing areas of concern, I think you missed something, Dolphin:

"EC has yet to invite an early career researcher to the Executive Board"

I might have misunderstood this, but if it is EC's responsibility to decide who is invited, I'm not very optimistic about this. I can't imagine her inviting an early-career researcher involved in cutting-edge biomedical research.

We've no idea how this project is going to pan out. It could be disastrous, but it could be transformational. I guess we'll find out in a couple of years or so.
 

Esther12

Senior Member
Messages
13,774
Likes
28,359
I'm increasingly doubtful that any good will come of this. I doubt that much good will come from any CFS 'collaborations' when so many of those who have built their careers on CFS are quacks. So long as they're allowed to go on clinging to authority and money, things will only be able to progress very slowly.
 

Simon

Senior Member
Messages
3,788
Likes
14,822
Location
Monmouth, UK
Minutes from the CMRC September 24th meeting can be downloaded here.

This includes a report on the conference, as well as plans to evaluate the conference:
· Evaluation: we need to be clear what impact the conference has had e.g. What new collaborations and/or grants have resulted from relationships and ideas from the conference. Agreed SC to undertake survey with research attendees in 6 months.
I was particularly interested in this

Future Work


a) Grand Challenge

· SH outlined his thoughts that he has shared at various patient meetings and the conference regarding the need for a systemic approach to be taken to enhance and catalyse more and better research in a coordinated, strategic way.

This will require a top-down approach (complementing the bottom-up approach being taken with researchers and PPI).

It will be a five year follow up to the workshop held previously which led to the MRC funding. It will need to consider delivery on a national scale and utilising new technology and the ‘omics’.

· All agreed that this would be a productive activity and should lead to more funding and ultimately more high quality research.

· Agreed that the Board will write to a number of key stakeholders, including those outside the field, to invite input to a workshop held early next calendar year. Will require work to identify funding for this.
More about this approach in Stephen Holgate's talk to patients (video, plus slide show for a faster version). IT has the potential to move things onto a much bigger scale, and I hope it gets somewhere.

b) Future Collaborations

· Invite other illness groups to present on how they have moved similar collaborations forward to inform future activity. Ideas to SC and contacts will be made by the CMRC as a whole. This would contribute to sustainability.

· Need to identify a mechanism for assessing the health, social and economic burden of the illness to help raise profile and engage those outside the field.
Encouraging, I think.