So here is what I don't understand about the alleged conspiracy to ignore chronic Lyme. Usually, conspiracy theories are about money -- big pharma has coopted the government to promote drugs, vaccines, etc. But here, the usual treatment for chronic Lyme is long-term drugs, with lots of doctors' visits, tests, etc. So what's the motive for the mainstream medicine/CDC conspiracy here?
One of my pet peeves with doctors of all sorts is confirmation bias. Put another way, to someone with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. I have seen this repeatedly in all sorts of medical settings. One of the reasons I have been reluctant to see a so-called LLD is my assumption that they will diagnose anyone with significant symptoms on the spectrum (which is a near-universal list as far as I can tell, and virtually identical to a host of other syndromes and conditions) with Lyme, even if all testing is negative. (Parenthetically, despite the oft-repeated mantra of the chronic Lyme community that Lyme is a clinical diagnosis, I observe that self-designated experts on internet forums are very quick to tell people "You have Lyme" on the basis of no history, physical exam, etc.) Perhaps this is irrational but I have grave doubts anyone can or will be objective, particularly in the highly politicized climate. Tens of millions of people have pain and fatigue. Surely they don't all have Lyme?
All that said, if anyone has any solid information about what symptom constellation -- in the absence of any history of tick bite or acute onset illness -- is truly indicative of chronic Lyme, I would be interested. Thanks.