JHP Editorial: Special Issue on the PACE Trial

[Countrygirl]

This was also posted by David Marks in the last few hours.

Wow! Incredible: Lancet implies it published the #PACEtrial knowing it would "attract criticism & controversy", i.e. that PACE was rubbish

 

[Esther12]

This was also posted by David Marks in the last few hours.

No... they knew it would be controversial because patients are so unreasonable and stupid. How noble of them to stand up against us.

 

[CFS_for_19_years]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/899176767558213632

 

[Valentijn]

Wow! Incredible: Lancet implies it published the #PACEtrial knowing it would "attract criticism & controversy", i.e. that PACE was rubbish

So the Lancet is now a shock blog that trolls the medical profession? I'm sticking with the assessment that they're a bunch of revisionist liars who uncritically promote psychobabble and poor methodology, while doing their damnedest to suppress or deride actual criticism.

But it's interesting that they're backing away from supporting PACE

 

[Jonathan Edwards]

So Mr David Kelly-Anne Clark thinks that there are 'very fine people on both sides'. Seems to be the message of the month.

Nobody is backing away from anything as far as I can see. They just employed a spin doctor who knows nothing about anything. (Senior Vice President by the way means just below tea lady.)