I am feeling deflated. There we have Jen, articulate and bright and totally conversant with our illness delivering a talk that, from the tweets, appears to have been everything we might have hoped and more.
And yet, David Coleman, the person (presumably journalist?) who wrote that TED Blog after listening to the talk and who is presumably of at least average intelligence, appears to have interpreted the talk as a call for more biosociopsycho stuff, not less. I am sure most people who are unfamiliar with ME and the politics around the illness reading that blog,
even after the edits, would interpret it as saying that medical scientists and psychologists need to come together to solve the illness.
The blog still starts:
Imagining a distinct border between mind and body has been a useful rule of thumb since Enlightenment philosophers dreamt it up centuries ago. It’s been particularly useful for modern medicine which has focused its scientific eye on the rational, physical body — and for the most part left the mind with all its mutability and moods to others to cure.
and
Brea started doing her own digging online, finding a whole population of millions of people with similar symptoms who had been diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, an widespread phenomenon that is poorly understood and badly under-researched
So, what we have is not an illness or disease, it's a 'phenomenon'. Can you imagine anyone saying that about cancer for example? As in 'oh, he's suffering from the phenomenon of testicular cancer'.
I know, I know, I'm cranky and 'glass half empty' today. And we should be celebrating a great talk delivered in an important forum. But really?
If a presumably sympathetic person can listen to a passionately delivered, informed talk and still think and write this kind of stuff, well, we have a long way to go.