Rebeccare
Moose Enthusiast
- Messages
- 9,073
- Location
- Massachusetts
Another response to the WSJ from the Solve ME/CFS Initiative
Interesting:
but to a first approximation it appears that 70–80% of people experiencing severe acute reactions to COVID-19 are men, whereas women comprise 70–80% of those suffering from long COVID.
Really enjoyed this article. I thought it was great. Nervous system could be a huge resevoir of viruses. See @Pyrrhus 's quote and highlights of it:This article from Nature on long haul covid is very fascinating.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01145-z
A new paper in Nature that is really making some waves:
Scientists set out to connect the dots on long COVID (Marx, 2021)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-021-01145-z
Excerpt:
(emphasis added)
My only complaint in the article was Nath talking about "exercise intolerance" and giving an example of someone ascending a flight of stairs. The issue is "exertion intolerance" which is much broader than "exercise intolerance." When researchers are not careful with their words, it leads to so much misinformation...like coining this illness "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome"...totally minimizing the impact of it.Really enjoyed this article. I thought it was great. Nervous system could be a huge resevoir of viruses. See @Pyrrhus 's quote and highlights of it:
We treat symptoms. We don't treat the disease. (referring to modern medicine in general)
There is no one (single) drug that can resolve COVID or [Post-COVID]
We got gaslighted by the medical community. Establishment hospitals, establishment university programs said they want nothing to do with us, even though now, we have a peer-reviewed paper.
Not one, but two articles in the press today about Long Covid needing to be scrutinized and questioning the allocation to the NIH to fund research. The articles circle around the concept that Long Covid is likely some form of hysteria. Sound familiar?
Sadly, this first article is by an Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School:
https://www.statnews.com/2021/03/22...re-critically-speaking-cautiously-long-covid/
And, this second article in the Wall Street Journal:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dubious-origins-of-long-covid-11616452583
I think that it's going to be a tough battle and ultimately long COVID will be dismissed like CFS/ME. The reason, in my opinion, is that the symptoms too closely match or overlap with symptoms that are prevalent with anxiety. Until there is an acceptable diagnostic test for whatever it is we have going on I think it will all be soon pushed aside. I hate to say this because in general I'm an optimist but I'm also a realist and that is what my gut is telling me of human nature and the medical profession.
Yes, they are already seeing that many of the early long haulers are slowly starting to recover.
Even pre-COVID, "cold" viruses have been getting worse and worse over the last 5-7 years. More and more people having colds that don't go away for several months and come and go often over a 6 month period.
My pre-COVID Dec 2019 (which couldn't be COVID because of the timing) virus was acute like a really, really bad cold in lower throat (and conjunctivitis) for all of December then HELL in January with loss of smell, loss of appetite, absolute deathly fatigue, and the weirdest kind of anxiety. February - March I was starting to recover at about 60% (?) of my normal crappy. April - June I was seemingly back to my normal crappy but in reality I was really about 85%-90%. Then suddenly at some point, I'm not sure when....I realized, hey, I feel normal again.
we are learning that covid was here earlier than we originally thought. You ever get antibody test before vaccination ? Loss of smell is suspicious.
we are learning that covid was here earlier than we originally thought. You ever get antibody test before vaccination ? Loss of smell is suspicious.