worldbackwards
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,051
Are we to assume that there's been no appeal then?
How can we know this?Are we to assume that there's been no appeal then?
An extension to appeal? Sorry, I don't know but I'm guessing that they couldn't. 28 days should be adequate.Can they ask for more time if they were wanting to appeal @Scarecrow do you know ?
I appreciate the ICO's support for this FOI request (FS50565190). Unfortunately, today I received an email from the ICO to inform me that QMUL have appealed to the Information Tribunal. I am relieved that a solicitor will now be defending the case with input from me if necessary.
wow, how much money are they wasting on defending this....
Seems like the date for the hearing is over 3 days! In April. I got this from The information tribunal register
EA/2015/0269 Queen Mary University of
London
23-Nov-15 FS50565190 Queen Mary
University of London
Mr Alem Matthees Three Day Hearing
20,21,22/04/ 2016 -
Residential Property
Tribunal,Court H,10
Alfred Place
London WC1E 7LR
Is that open to the public do you know?
I don't understand the AnnieGSampel joke!I get the Spartacus reference but what's the deal with the name?
Annie Gsample sounds like 'an example'- that is all there is to it. Really.Me neither. Even now.![]()
iz
It started with a joke, by Graham, who used the name "Annie Gsample" to mean "an example".Me neither. Even now.![]()
iz
It certainly is beyond overdue and makes you wonder what the heck is happening and how many times the stakeholders on the psych lobby side have attempted to contact the judge and try to steer the decision in their favor. Because this is what they do.I can't believe we're still waiting for this ruling! Three months.... I need to know.
It started with a joke, by Graham, who used the name "Annie Gsample" to mean "an example".
I think it was in relation to the PACE trial but, my brain being what it is, I've completely forgotten the details now!![]()
Annie Gsample sounds like 'an example'- that is all there is to it. Really.