ME Association not prepared to confirm the source of the XMRV "prostate cancer" test
(Copy to Dr Judy Mikovits)
8 February 2010
The ME Association is not prepared to confirm the source of the XMRV
"prostate cancer" test information
Shortlink: http://wp.me/p5foE-2Ll
On 6 February, the ME Association put out the following notice:
http://tinyurl.com/MEAonICLXMRVtest
"Late last night The ME Association was informed that this announcement
about XMRV testing does not apply to people with ME/CFS, or suspected
ME/CFS. It only relates to the availability of the Imperial College XMRV
test to referring doctors who are dealing with cases of prostate cancer. A
full clarification will appear on the Imperial College website on Monday.
It will appear here once we have it."
Note no source for this information is given.
This morning, Imperial College, London, took down its XMRV Testing webpages and published this notice:
http://wwwfom.sk.med.ic.ac.uk/medici..._notification/
Imperial College London XMRV Testing Notification
XMRV testing
"We wish to apologise for any confusion concerning the availability of
this test and would like to clarify that it is only available as part of an
ethically approved research project. We emphasis that our laboratory does
not deal directly with patients and we are not advising people who are
concerned that they might have CFS, or who have been diagnosed with CFS,
to request this test."
Note no
"full clarification" and no explanation of the specific purpose for
which this test is intended - only that it is
"only available as part of
an ethically approved research project" and that Imperial College is
"not
advising people who are concerned that they might have CFS, or who have
been diagnosed with CFS, to request this test."
So, a test for detection of XMRV in what, precisely, and for what research
project?
On Sunday, I emailed Tony Britton, ME Association Press and PR, with a
request that the ME Association clarifies the source of its information
that:
"It only relates to the availability of the Imperial College XMRV test to
referring doctors who are dealing with cases of prostate cancer."
No response.
A few minutes ago, I telephoned Tony Britton for clarification. Mr Britton
says he is not prepared to "reveal his sources".
I asked Mr Britton if he would confirm or deny whether the information came
directly from Imperial College. He will not.
I asked Mr Britton if he would confirm or deny whether the information came
directly from Professor Simon Wessley.
Again, Mr Britton is not prepared to confirm or deny and terminated the
exchange.
Given the paucity of information contained within the notification issued
by Imperial College, this morning, speculation if rife.
The ME Association is evidently not prepared to be transparent.
How then, without knowing the source, can we decide whether this
information might be relied upon or not?
Perhaps in future, if the ME Association is unwilling to provide verifiable
sources for information such as this (which is in the public interest) it
should think very hard about whether it should be prepared to put that
information out in the first place.
So who was the ME Association acting as a spokesperson for?
And why is Imperial College not prepared to be transparent about the
purpose of this test?
Suzy Chapman
http://meagenda.wordpress.com