We must be talking about Sean? Still haunts me. The thing is, if it really was HSV1 encephalitis, he would need IV antivirals. Giving those meds that wipe out antibodies would make a person feel better in the short run but would make condition worse as the virus flourishes. Im not sure he had evidence if it was autoimmune encephalitis vs viral encephalitis. Ad if he had both, thats especially challenging. . Also haunts me because especIally because i had so many of the sane things as him. One of my takeways was that pursuing every possible treatment in whatever country will treat you (and many young, eapecially men try one treatment after another relentlessly) may not be the best approach to this beast either- give body more tine. If i reached the wrong takeaway and misapprehending what happened with sean over his years on the list, someone please correct me .
Yes, that was who I was referring to. I think we would have to reread his many posts following the trajectory of his illness. What I understood from them was that he did contract HSV1 which triggered neurological autoimmune antibodies. What I understand the treatment to be is to beat back the virus with antivirals, support the immune system, then get rid of the antibodies with plasmapharesis, Rituximab and/or Bortezimub. This video described some of this - it gets interesting around minute 58:
None of this is easy, and antibodies can return. Unfortunately, we will never know all the details of Sean's illness.
I do think one of the lessons to be learned is that it's ideal to have a coordinated team of doctors who can provide continuous care over a lengthy, complex illness, but honestly, I think that this is currently beyond the realm of any current medical system, except perhaps Nancy Klimas' clinic.
On rest of learners post, i doNt see why a smart well read person shold have to convince MDs of anything to get the care they need. Id like if the med system had an “opt ou” clause where you can be ykur own PCP. These folks have all contributed to killing me because they arent as knowlegeble or smart as I am. One of my internist misi trepreted law and accused me of trying to practice medicine without a liscence whereas i i am just trying to save my own life.
Unfortunately, there used to be the "Wild West" of medicine where anything went and patients died. Charlatans sold snake oil, or worse, poison, and care was not based in science. Then there was the era of standardization in the US, in the era of the Flexner Report and its aftermath, which then got exported to many other countries. Laws were encoded and medical boards empowered to protect patients from themselves and those would prey upon them, so that we could only be treated by those with 8 years of medical education.
Like you, I have educated myself a lot, and have amassed a library of resources and an understanding of the human body and medicine that has been helpful in my quest for health. Unfortunately, we did not get a medical degree and are left to try to convince our doctors (and clinics, hospitals, insurance, the FDA, and drug companies) to order tests and treatments that we believe will better illuminate and fix what ails us, it at least give it a good try.
The people we deal with on this journey have their own goals and constraints which may be in conflict with what we and our doctors are trying to do. At worst, it costs us in money or risky outcomes, while our doctors may lose their jobs, medical licenses, or reputations if they help us do something that seems right at the time but later proved harmful. So, we need to arm them with information to give them confidence to help us without risking undesirable consequences.
I sure wish this were easier, but, unfortunately, some not so smart or lucky people preceded us in this system...
So gathering good scientific information and resources, and sharing them logically with our doctors to have successes, and then exchanging info within a community like this to help others will gradually normalize good things that seem like fringe actions right now.