I've noticed that when I react to a drug the drug also becomes inactive. For example, once I develop an allergy to an antibiotic no matter how much I take of it for however long it will have no effect on me and after testing again for said infection it will still be there unchanged. I've noticed this with many of the drugs Ive tried. Thats also why Xolair doesnt work for me anymore. IgE destroys whatever enters my body.
Are you referring mostly to meds in which you have had either an IgE or Mast Cell mediated allergic reaction? Did you have an allergic reaction to the Rituximab (sorry if you shared this and I missed it or am not remembering). Do you have MCAS?
I've only done a single Rituxan infusion, next one is in 1.5 wks.
There is no possible way that you would feel the benefit of Rituximab from one single infusion. You have not even had the second half of the loading dose (Day 14). I am not sure if it is different in cancer cases but in autoimmunity, I have never heard of anyone experiencing a benefit that quickly. It is way too early to know if you are a responder.
Thank you for the explanation. So it can take quite a while before significant improvement can be felt. Have to wait out the plasma cell life span. Before my next infusion Im going to get my B cells checked to make sure Rituxan is actually working in my body. Though I suspect it is, dont feel any benefit yet but my immune system does seem weakened more than usual.
My doctor said that he was almost certain that my B cells would be at zero from the first infusion alone (Day Zero) but regardless, I would still do the second infusion on schedule (Day 14). I know we ran the Lymphocyte Subset Panel to confirm that my B cells were at zero (and they were) but I cannot remember without going through my records if we ran it after the first infusion or waited until both were done.
Also, there are sort of two parts to Rituximab. If your B cells are at zero, then it means that it did indeed do it's job and it worked. However, that does not mean that you will be a responder (which takes longer to determine). However, if you did the first two infusions and your B cells were NOT at zero, then it means that it actually did not work and something went wrong. I hope that makes sense.
Also, it does technically make you immunocompromised so when you said that your immune system felt weaker, I was curious what you meant? Were you feeling flu-like symptoms or any signs of traditional illness? For whatever reason (I think b/c I am a freak of nature

), I did not become immunocompromised from Ritux. During the period of my Ritux infusions, I was at the hospital daily for 2.5 months while my mom was dying of cancer. Six members of my family got sick (and I was exposed to all of them plus there was a horrible flu throughout the hospital) yet I was the only family member who did not get sick. It was truly bizarre.
I have still not had a traditional illness of any kind in almost six years and my doctor's only guess is that I am still skewed very heavily toward autoimmunity. However, I have followed the instructions of Ritux including not being closely exposed to anyone who has had a "live vaccine" and I have of course avoided all vaccines myself.
Edited to add: Blake, I just re-read this thread and had forgotten that you have primary immunodeficiency (which I do not have). That makes your situation very different than mine and I am wondering if you might need extra precautions? Do you also have MCAS?