Now i know youre trolling lol
dude, I am not trolling. It is 100% true.
Now i know youre trolling lol
Honestly , with due respect, it seems you might be.
When I said trolling, I was referring to @bread.'s comments where he initially said (incorrectly) that "there is absolutely zero prevalences of any of these diseases that you cant trust- how would you".
And then later, when I provided ready-made Google search which listed these studies, he refused to look at it, and continued to ask me for info about prevalences.
When I said trolling, I was referring to @bread.'s comments where he initially said (incorrectly) that "there is absolutely zero prevalences of any of these diseases that you cant trust- how would you".
And then later, when I provided ready-made Google search which listed these studies, he refused to look at it, and continued to ask me for info about prevalences.
It is impossible to have a somewhat correct prevalance rate of a disease that is not yet clearly defined as a disease by a biomarker. It is guesswork, at best.
Exclusions: Exclude active disease processes that explain most of the major symptoms of fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction. It is essential to exclude certain diseases, which would
be tragic to miss: Addison’s disease, Cushing’s Syndrome, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, iron deficiency, other treatable forms of anemia, iron overload syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and cancer.
It is also essential to exclude treatable sleep disorders such as upper airway resistance syndrome and obstructive or central sleep apnea; rheumatological disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, polymyositis and polymyalgia rheumatica; immune disorders such as AIDS; neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinsonism, myasthenia gravis and B12 deficiency; infectious diseases such as
tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis, Lyme disease, etc.; primary psychiatric disorders and substance abuse.
Exclusion of other diagnoses, which cannot be reasonably excluded by the patient’s history and physical examination, is achieved by laboratory testing and imaging. If a potentially confounding medical condition is under control, then the diagnosis of ME/CFS can be entertained if patients meet the criteria otherwise.
OK, so you are saying that all prevalence rate studies are wrong because you believe that there is no clearly defined way to diagnose ME/CFS.
Well that is not really true: ME/CFS does not have a biomarker, but it is a reasonably defined illness, if you properly follow diagnostic criteria such as the CCC.
Because there is no biomarker, ME/CFS is defined by criteria which are based on symptoms. These criteria will also involve exclusions. For example, in the CCC, it says:
Thus if you are positive for the CCC symptom criteria, and you do not have any of these excluded illnesses, then by definition you have ME/CFS.
Now, it is often mentioned that ME/CFS may involve different subsets; some people for example talk about viral versus autoimmune subsets (though there's little evidence to support such a distinction). And most people would agree that ME/CFS likely involves several subtypes.
But that does not mean that the prevalence studies are incorrect.
Hip i think we are going to have to agree to disagree. Time is going to tell. You obviously don't think EDS is a major player whereas me and perhaps i can speak for Bread, feel that the diagnostic criteria for both diseases are not robust enough to actually mean too much when EDS, Fibro, Lups, CFS etc all lhave overlapping symptoms. The criteria you mention are not biomarkers therefore by definition are not rigorous. All the above mentioned diseases are connective tissue diseases...so whats the correlation??? It seems increasingly obviously both known and unknown EDS types play a role in CFS. We will have to wait and see won't we?
I'm calling into question what youre calling into question! I understand the orthodox nature of what youre saying. I just don't agree with it. Like i say lets agree to disagree?@Oliver3 I am not discounting the possibility that hEDS may predispose to ME/CFS.
But I am calling into question the views expressed in this thread that it is impossible to distinguish ME/CFS from EDS, and the views that we can know nothing about the prevalence of ME/CFS or hEDS in the general population.
The geneticist that diagnosed me was very clear that my hEDS diagnosis voided my Fibro dx (at least in his eyes).EDS, Fibro, Lups, CFS etc all lhave overlapping symptoms. ?
The geneticist that diagnosed me was very clear that my hEDS diagnosis voided my Fibro dx (at least in his eyes).
I don't think youre going to understand the point i'm making.
I understand that you and @bread. have a personal theory that ME/CFS is really EDS. However, you have not provided any significant evidence or theoretical justification for your theory. So it's hard to discuss you opinions anyway, because there is very little substance to them that can be discussed.
You also have personal views on the inadequacy of diagnostic criteria of ME/CFS and EDS, and you believe that because of this claimed inadequacy, it is not possible to distinguish these two diseases. But again you have not provided any evidence to support your statement (in terms of references to studies or other medical literature).
Now, if you presented some interesting ideas or evidence that can link ME/CFS and EDS, then I am all ears. But so far, all I have heard is opinions without supporting evidence.
I understand that you and @bread. have a personal theory that ME/CFS is really EDS. However, you have not provided any significant evidence or theoretical justification for your theory. So it's hard to discuss you opinions anyway, because there is very little substance to them that can be discussed.
You also have personal views on the inadequacy of diagnostic criteria of ME/CFS and EDS, and you believe that because of this claimed inadequacy, it is not possible to distinguish these two diseases. But again you have not provided any evidence to support your statement (in terms of references to studies or other medical literature).
Now, if you presented some interesting ideas or evidence that can link ME/CFS and EDS, then I am all ears. But so far, all I have heard is opinions without supporting evidence.
This year I was told at an ME clinic that hEDS is no big deal, there is no way it is the root of my problems and I was making entirely too big a deal about the whole thing. The big deal that I made was to question if there was a basis for hEDS causing any of the issues. That ended the trust in that relationship.
This is wrong. If 50% of PWME have hEDS (I have heard this), then the general ignorance most ME/CFS clinicians have about hEDS is no longer defensible. They should be attending EDS conferences or doing EDS CMEs.
And what about people, like me, in that other 50%, who do not have hEDS by any definition but have all of its cousins?
Byron Hyde would probably say it’s the ground in which it flourishes: https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Comorbidities_of_Myalgic_Encephalomyelitis#Clinical_perspectives
And Peter Rowe has been banging this drum for years: https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Neural_strain, which may be an important intersection between hEDS and ME.
You need 248 cases to test 1 SNP that you already suspect. To identify an unknown SNP, you must test more locations, so more cases are needed.I would not have thought that would be the case if you are assuming the mutations are common. If you are assuming ME/CFS is a form of EDS, then you'd expect those EDS mutations in lots patients.
That would require access to some competent physician. Sorry. No testing is available to me unless i can work out how to travel many states away while being homebound and needing to keep my legs elevated and lie down a lot. Sleeper cars in trains are super expensive, especially the ones with the included bathroom.if you have been tested for CCI, please do fill out my CCI survey
There is one flaw in your argument. There's virtually no research done on EDS and even less so on the comparisons with the two diseases. Tell me how me and my friend differ. He has heds, i have CFS.
Tell me how me and my friend differ. He has heds, i have CFS.
He has pots. thats a tick for me.
He has Pem. Tick for me.
He has dysautomnia. Tick for me.
He has thinnish skin. Tick for me.
He scored quite a few of points on the Beighton scale. I have hypermobile toes, thats it. Then again, i have a herniaand other weak connective tissues.
He has orthastic intolerance. Thats a tick fo rme.
He has problems with cold extremes. Tick fo rme.
He has sympathetic activation and mastcell problems.
What we keeo tryingto tell you is that youre thinking inside a very tight box.
How does it take into accopunt mitral valve prolapse