biophile
Places I'd rather be.
- Messages
- 8,977
Has this happened on Wall Street yet?
no but we got this few years ago, "Chrisitans" praying before the Golden Bull in Wall Street to make the economy recover....
think they skipped out ENTIRELY on what Moses and Jesus said, don't ya think?
View attachment 5015
I consider myself "Christian" but nitwits like those have made that term very very....problematical, for millennia, sigh
Time to turn tide on ME therapies
MY DAUGHTER was diagnosed in 1999 at the age of eight with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) by the late Dr Alan Franklin, a paediatrician specialising in children with this illness (“Scientists under siege”, Magazine, last week).
Dr Franklin travelled the country supporting families threatened with removal of their severely ill ME children, most of whom were housebound — and many bedridden and tube-fed such as my daughter — with symptoms that included, among others, paralysis, nerve and muscle pain, nausea and loss of speech.
These children were suffering from what the World Health Organisation classifies as a severe and chronic neurological — not mental — illness. Sadly, families with such children are still being pressured today to make them undergo inappropriate and invasive treatments precisely because the prevailing view is that the chronic element of ME is psychological. Too many of my daughter’s friends remain bedridden with horrendous symptoms because of the misguided use of “therapies”.
Kathleen Goodchild, St Albans, Hertfordshire
Positive action
Far from “skewing a whole branch of medicine”, responsible activism in ME is directed at promoting and encouraging scientific research and its funding. Activism has been pivotal in improving research and treatment for many diseases, including Aids, multiple sclerosis, breast cancer and malaria, with the government bringing up the rear.
Jean Harrison, Salem, Massachusetts, USA
Help, not hinder
Unfortunately your article will reinforce the idea that ME/CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome) is a mental health disorder and can therefore be dismissed. I am the sister of a severely disabled sufferer for 26 years, and we are desperate for the cause, whether psychological or not, to be found and for an effective treatment.
This can only happen with far greater funding for research into this devastating condition. The misguided actions of a small minority will only hinder this and thereby prolong the agony of sufferers.
Debbie Gilbert, Watford, Hertfordshire
Cause for collaboration
The UK’s leading ME/CFS charities deplore the harassment or abuse of researchers undertaken by a tiny but vocal minority of people. Many sufferers are living without treatment or support, or even a proper diagnosis — this should be the real headline news.
We wish to support researchers to help us better understand the causes and to improve treatments. The future for many thousands of patients will depend on constructive collaboration between patients, charities, funders and scientists.
Mary-Jane Willows, Association of Young People with ME (AYME), Action for ME, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Foundation, ME Association, ME Research UK
Joining forces
Thankfully these days there are a good number of specialist NHS services for those affected across the UK by CFS/ME. These services deal with 9,000 new referrals a year in England and since being established in 2004 have seen 70,000 cases.
We are much encouraged by collaborative research led by experts in the field and supported by the Medical Research Council and national charities that is looking at ways to improve and expand research into this life-changing illness, which affects about 1-2% of the adults and teenagers in Britain.
Michelle Selby, British Association for CFS/ME, Dr Alastair Miller, Consultant Physician in Infectious Disease, Liverpool CFS service
Therapist support
There is another understanding of ME that sees it as neither a result of a virus nor a mental illness. Therapies that find the roots of ME in primary, fundamental emotions see the physical condition as essentially a symptom of these.
These approaches (which are not cognitive behaviour therapy or otherwise psychotherapeutic) say that the key lies in recognising these fundamental emotions, their sources, and taking constructive actions based upon them, raising the consciousness of an individual and so empowering them.
Crucial to this, of course, is the therapeutic relationship between the therapist and the client, as my wife has discovered in her own practice.
Andrew Whiteley, Consett, Co. Durham
Research moves on
Legitimate requests for further information, missing data and clarifications (FoI or otherwise) should not be conflated with the reported “extremist” behaviour. Michael Hanlon’s article did not appear to be particularly fresh or current. An article in The Times in 2011 featured most of the same protagonists, claims and counter-claims.
Thankfully serious scientific research has moved on, as reported in The Times (April 23), “Scientists have found compelling new evidence for an underlying biological cause”.
Duncan & Lesley Cox, Rugby, Warwickshire
Majority report
What a pity that you devote an entire article on ME to publicity for the 50-80 activists engaged in an abhorrent hate campaign and ignore the 550,000 ME sufferers, who wait patiently for some effective treatment for this dreadful disease. I have had ME for 21 years after catching a virus on holiday and it has robbed me of any kind of normal life.
All I, and most sufferers, want is some effective treatment which at present does not exist (I have tried them all!). We do not care what our illness is; we just want someone to find out the cause and hopefully a cure.
Two weeks ago, a report in The Times, “Biological breakthrough offers fresh hope for ME sufferers,” featured the work of the dean for clinical medicine at Newcastle university, who has discovered “very real abnormalities" in the cells of ME sufferers — proof that it is not “all in the mind" . It’s a pity that you did not focus on the newer more hopeful biomedical research such as this.
Rosey Lowry, Saxmundham, Suffolk
Activists miss the target
My wife was diagnosed with a severe case of CFS some months ago. As there is no medical cure as yet, we had to tackle the disease head on if she were going to have a life of some normality. We gleaned all we could from the book by Jacob Teitelbaum and are making good but slow process towards recovery.
The emotional and mental fatigue is as debilitating as the physical side, and we both wonder just how the “activists" are able to spend so much time and energy in their vitriolic and pathetic pursuits. Sufferers from ME/CFS require much patience, long term care and understanding; a cure is much needed from wherever it may emerge. Those researching the illnesses are to be applauded.
Jeremy Rugge-Price, Orford, Suffolk
We, ME/CFS patients could use the same methods as Wessely. That is use the press and media and use a grouping of eminent doctors and scientists to co-author and co-sign letters and present articles to the Times, the Guardian, the Observer, the Mail, the New York Times, etc. etc. If we copy his methods to advance a biological agenda then we can battle him and win.
I have drawn up a listing of researchers and doctors we all need to contact and form into a group known as the 'Biological doctors and scientists group'. All letters and emails to the press and media and to scientific journals worldwide should be passed to these people first for co-authoring and co-signing. This will add scientific credibility to ME/CFS and its biological aspects.
Dr. Nancy Klimas
Dr. Daniel Peterson
Dr. Paul Cheney
Dr. Kenny De Meirleir
Dr. Byron Hyde
Dr. Derek Enlander
Dr. Hooper
Dr. Edward J. Conley
Dr. Charles Lapp
Dr. Kerr
Dr. Martin Lerner
Dr. Martin Pall
Dr. Olav Mella
Dr. John Chia
Dr. Jose Montoya
Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum
Dr. Konstance Knox
Dr. Buchwald
Dr. Jesse Stoff
Dr. CL Jardin
Dr. Sarah Myhill
Dr. Rosamund Vallings
Dr. Gorter
Dr. Majid Ali
Dr. Vance Spence
Dr. Julia Newton
Dr. Vincent Lombardi
Dr. William Weir
Dr. Nash Petrovic
Dr. Bridget Huber
Dr. Luc Montagnier
Dr. Anthony Komaroff
Dr. Ablashi
Dr. Jay Levy
Dr. Hornig
Dr. Ian Lipkin
Dr. Maes
Dr. Curriu (Spain)
Doctors from PHANU, Australia
Dr. Bateman
Dr. Daraniuk
Dr. Schutzer
You can add a few more to the list.
Can we all start this week ?
I've spotted a rather significant contradiction here:
But later, Wessely says:
So, first he says that there are no complaints from his own patients, at his clinics. And then he indicates that people have real issues at his clinics when subjected to his (inappropriate) therapies. So much so that they feel threatened and resentment.
Bob.. I think when he said that part about his patients finding patient groups threatening. I think he was rather refering to say patient groups like PR or other patient groups about the place, I dont think he was refering to any patient groups he runs.
It's just my take on it, and I might be way off, but my thoughts on it are as follows...
Governments don't like any types of 'outbreaks', or other such unpredictable events, and they quickly move to put a lid on potentially escalating public relations disasters. Outbreaks or other such unpredictable events can quickly escalate into public alarm and panic, and very bad public relations disasters for governments. Governments don't like 'unknowns' and they like to keep a lid on alarming 'events', including health scares (unless the public 'alarm' helps them in facilitating their desired policies.)
So, when 'unknowns' occur, governments look towards people who can give them quick, simple but reassuring and convincing answers.
The only treatments I ever received has been abuse and derision - no kidding - no exaggeration - and that has discouraged me from seeking medical help for anything. If the purpose was to shut me up, then it worked.
No doctor ever asked me to describe my symptoms, nor was willing to listen to me for five minutes, nor performed any tests that weren't routine eliminations. In fact, nobody ever studied me. I suppose the same applies to all the others.
Munchhausens!!! Really!!! As my dh said to me not that long ago (he works for CAMHS) "no real doctor would dare try and raise the Munchhausens label these days. They would look stupid." If only that was true in adult medicine too.
"no real doctor would dare try and raise the Munchhausens label these days. They would look stupid."
the issue is we need all those people focused on their patients and research.. not spending say a quarter of their time fighting what is going on. Its only by good research which is then backed by others, will we ever be free of the mess . Let our researchers focus on their fields.. the research.