SOC
Senior Member
- Messages
- 7,849
Nope, not true. There are no guarantees, but there are plenty of people who have improved more than slightly under the care of top ME/CFS specialists.With whatever things doctors can do today, they can only improve the patient slightly.
On what evidence do you base that absolute statement? It is my opinion that a cure is not possible at this point in time, but I acknowledge that that's an opinion based on belief, not an absolute fact.No remissions or recoveries are possible with any doctor treatments.
If a treatment given by a doctor or by the patient himself causes improvements like a year later, it would be difficult to rule out spontaneous improvements.
In my opinion, if a given treatment does not make a noticeable improvement in about 3 months or so, the credibility of that treatment (vs.spontaneous improvement) is very much in question.
A number of treatments show some improvements in the first 3 months, but to see significant improvement make take longer duration treatment.
I think you are being overly pessimistic and grossly oversimplifying a complicated situation.There are people who have recovered after a few years, and they attribute that to their own treatments, but here the recovery is spontaneous.
There may be some cases where patients have spontaneous remission, but the patient population is not stupid. Most of us can distinguish between the effect of a treatment and spontaneous recovery. People who slowly improve over time, with or without treatment, may be experiencing spontaneous improvement. That does not occur for most of us. We do not improve without treatment (and often decline) and we do improve with some treatments.
If a patient is declining rapidly, starts a new treatment and begins to improve, even if slowly, it is not likely that the patient coincidentally had a spontaneous improvement at exactly the same time they began treatment. Similarly if a patient has been stable at a certain level and then begins to improve with some treatment, it is far more likely the treatment is having a positive effect than that a spontaneous remission happened out of nowhere at exactly the same time.
It's also clear that the improvement is not spontaneous if the patient improves with a treatment, declines again when treatment is withdrawn, then improves again when treatment is begun again.
I find that attitude very condescending. I am an intelligent person educated on at top university in a scientific field. I understand logic and critical thinking better than most doctors. I'm highly analytical and am not subject to placebo effect. I have the skills to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment protocols for myself, and I use those skills. I have not run from pillar to post. I have not been to fringe doctors. I have not wasted money on questionable treatments that didn't help me. Everything I've spent a significant amount of money on has given me a significant improvement. Most of my treatments are not extraordinarily expensive.I understand the fact that desperate patients run from pillar to post, from good physicians to fringe doctors, and spend lots of money. In such cases, however, there is more damage done to the body by the traveling itself, than any possible benefit that can be gained.
I think it is difficult for anyone who hasn't been under the care of a top ME/CFS to understand what it is that they do. There seems to be a lot of misinformation flying around -- mostly from people who haven't spent a reasonable amount of time following the treatment plan of a top doc.
No ME/CFS specialist I saw claimed to have a cure for ME/CFS. None of them claimed to be able to make a rapid improvement from severely ill to fully functional. They all felt they could make some degree of improvement in my functionality, and they all did, to varying degrees.
Last edited: