Of course, they are trying - as do with fatigue in every disorder - CBT
Some quality of life improvement here -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21069585
Here they found some improved mood and fatigue after CBT but no improvement in neuropsychological testing - they could improve how one felt, more quality of life stuff, but could not actually get at the deficits....This reminds me of the MSBR study that found improved quality of life in FM but no improvement in pain
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20804245
The UK has just started a huge CBT study on fatigue in MS! Its huge...Its going to employ "energy effectiveness" strategies and CBT (ie pacing strategies?) -
"Energy effectiveness approaches have been shown to be effective in reducing MS-fatigue, increasing self-efficacy and improving quality of life"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20553617
CBT helps in this study
Psychosom Med. 2008 Feb;70(2):205-13. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for multiple sclerosis fatigue.
van Kessel K, Moss-Morris R, Willoughby E, Chalder T, Johnson MH, Robinson E.
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Southampton, SO17 1 BJ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue.
METHODS: A randomized controlled design was used where 72 patients with MS fatigue were randomly assigned to eight weekly sessions of CBT or relaxation training (RT). RT was designed to control for therapist time and attention. Participants were assessed before and after treatment, and at 3 and 6 months posttreatment. The primary outcome was the Fatigue Scale. Secondary outcomes included measures of stress, mood, and fatigue-related impairment.
RESULTS: Analysis was by intention-to-treat. A group by time interaction showed that the CBT group reported significantly greater reductions in fatigue across the 8 months compared with the RT group (p < .02). Calculated effect sizes for fatigue from baseline to the end of treatment were 3.03 [95% confidence interval, 2.22-3.68] for the CBT group and 1.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.34] for the RT group. Results also indicted that both groups showed clinically significant decreases in fatigue defined as fatigue levels equivalent or less than those reported by a non-fatigued healthy comparison group. There were no significant interactions between group and any of the secondary outcome variables, with both groups showing improvements over time on all measures.
Well Cort, if Chalder and Moss-Morris can't fix MS with CBT, Phil Parker and his Licensed Lighting Process practitioners are aleady moving in on MS patients.
http://www.lightningprocess.com/Multiple-Sclerosis-Home/
http://www.lightningprocess.com/Multiple-Sclerosis-How-does-it-work/
This trial (PIs: Chalder and Moss-Morris) is actually being funded by the UK MS Society:
Abstract PubMed: http://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19698171
PDF full journal text:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2377-9-45.pdf
Open Access Text:
BMC Neurol. 2009;9:45.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/45
Study protocol
Protocol for the saMS trial (supportive adjustment for multiple sclerosis):
a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy to
supportive listening for adjustment to multiple sclerosis
Rona Moss-Morris1 , Laura Dennison1 , Lucy Yardley1 , Sabine Landau2 ,
Suzanne Roche3 , Paul McCrone4 and Trudie Chalder5
1 School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus,
Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
2 Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College
London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
3 Chronic Fatigue Unit, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS,
UK
4 Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of
Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
5 Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's
College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
author email corresponding author email [or contact forms refer to
website]
BMC Neurology 2009, 9:45doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-45
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found
online at:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/45
Received:15 July 2009
Accepted:23 August 2009
Published:23 August 2009
2009 Moss-Morris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.