mojoey
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,213
First of all, Freddd, it's encouraging to hear you don't have to avoid the vast majority of those ex-triggers anymore. At what point (or dosage of methylation supps) did that shift? Was it an abrupt shift or a gradual one?
As for the "categorization" debate, I think you had a few things going in your favor despite not having the success on other forums. 1) Cort wrote an article that clearly support what you were doing and it's a sticky at the top of this thread, 2) Rich has been laying the groundwork for methylation for 4 years so what you're talking about w.r.t to your own recovery was hardly unfathomable both experientially and theoretically.
This is not the case with avoidance. As Lisa alluded to above, avoidance is treated with a stigma. I'm inclined to think that human nature has a lot to do with it: our evolutionary buzz words are "survival of fittest," "war", "attack", "dominate", "top of the food chain." Avoidance goes against all of these because it forces us to cede ground to whatever we are avoiding and admit that, as Klingardt describes it, we are leftovers of evolution, the ones that have struggled to adapt genetically to an increasingly toxic world.
Although you are at the point now that you no longer have to avoid, I understand that Lisa has been doing hardcore methylation supplementation (b12 shots, jarrows sublinguals, deplin, etc) at very very high doses that probably equal yours on average, yet after 2 years of this she is still in avoidance mode and clearly made ill by biotoxins. Perhaps you have some ideas on what she is missing. I don't think the paradoxical folate deficiency applies to her.
So just as you were given a little catalyst en route to receiving the type of traffic you clearly deserve with your story and groundwork, I believe the avoidance experts (namely Lisa whom has put in more work than anyone outside of Erik Johnson on this topic and has the temperament to deal with both side of the topic like no other) can benefit from the same. Because this forum is so "pre-set" (if it weren't I highly doubt XMRV would still be occupying such precious real estate) a little top-down adjustment is necessary at times.
As for the "categorization" debate, I think you had a few things going in your favor despite not having the success on other forums. 1) Cort wrote an article that clearly support what you were doing and it's a sticky at the top of this thread, 2) Rich has been laying the groundwork for methylation for 4 years so what you're talking about w.r.t to your own recovery was hardly unfathomable both experientially and theoretically.
This is not the case with avoidance. As Lisa alluded to above, avoidance is treated with a stigma. I'm inclined to think that human nature has a lot to do with it: our evolutionary buzz words are "survival of fittest," "war", "attack", "dominate", "top of the food chain." Avoidance goes against all of these because it forces us to cede ground to whatever we are avoiding and admit that, as Klingardt describes it, we are leftovers of evolution, the ones that have struggled to adapt genetically to an increasingly toxic world.
Although you are at the point now that you no longer have to avoid, I understand that Lisa has been doing hardcore methylation supplementation (b12 shots, jarrows sublinguals, deplin, etc) at very very high doses that probably equal yours on average, yet after 2 years of this she is still in avoidance mode and clearly made ill by biotoxins. Perhaps you have some ideas on what she is missing. I don't think the paradoxical folate deficiency applies to her.
So just as you were given a little catalyst en route to receiving the type of traffic you clearly deserve with your story and groundwork, I believe the avoidance experts (namely Lisa whom has put in more work than anyone outside of Erik Johnson on this topic and has the temperament to deal with both side of the topic like no other) can benefit from the same. Because this forum is so "pre-set" (if it weren't I highly doubt XMRV would still be occupying such precious real estate) a little top-down adjustment is necessary at times.