- Messages
- 88
@Cam Newton I think I heard him say when he tested some patients other than the original ones from California who were positive for the IDO trap he found a second possible trap in those in an area somewhat related to IDO.
Hope conference organizers make the presentations available to re-watch, so much really good information.
I’ll watch it again. However from my understanding, they tested new people since September who did not have the kyn/trp ratio that would indicate a potential IDO trap. So either their new meausurements were off, the newly tested people didn’t have ME/CFS (or ME/CFS sub-group IDO trap), or the IDO trap doesn’t exist at all. They will be using a more accurate mass spec within 3 months to further investigate.
On the other trap, Dr Phair really only mentioned it when discussing that two patients, outside of Stanford, did not have any IDO gene defects. However they did have the gene defects that would allow this second trap to be a possibility - also that all other previous patients, from Stanford, also have the gene defect for the second trap.
Edit: I’m also curious what Dr Phair said regarding oxygen. I initially got sick after I started doing the stupid Wim Hoff method for about 1 month. This is essentially just hyperventilating that has been shown to increase blood oxygen levels - but not much else. Anyway, this is probably just a useless coincidence.