Doppler Radar Installations (NEXRAD) -- Neurologically Sensitive People Report Being Affected

[Wayne]

I just did some research on Doppler Radar installations (for weather scanning), and discovered they can be very problematic for people who are neurologically sensitive. Here's what I learned from ChatGPT. People with ME/CFS are specifically mentioned.

What hours do NEXRAD Doppler Radars operate?​

​

24/7/365.​

NEXRAD radars are always running, scanning the atmosphere every 4 to 10 minutes, depending on the radar's operating mode (which changes based on weather conditions like clear skies vs. stormy).​

They’re part of a national warning system, so continuous operation is essential.​

---

Do some people claim to be affected by Doppler/NEXRAD radars?​

Yes, there’s a subset of people who say they feel physical or mental effects from radar systems, especially electromagnetic-sensitive individuals. Here's a quick rundown:​

️ Common claims from self-identified radar-sensitive folks:​

• Headaches, pressure in the head
• Brain fog or mental fatigue
• Heart palpitations or anxiety
• Sleep disturbances
• Tingling or buzzing sensations

Most mainstream science considers these non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (like those from radar or Wi-Fi) to be too weak to cause biological harm, but that doesn't mean people aren't experiencing something — especially those who identify with EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity) or have conditions like ME/CFS, MCAS, or neurological sensitivities.​

​

[MY QUESTION] --How far away from doppler radar installations do people claim to experience negative effects?​

​

ChatGPT said:​

That’s a fascinating and very relevant question, especially for people with sensitive systems.​

Based on anecdotal reports and forums, people who claim to experience negative effects from Doppler/NEXRAD radars often report symptoms at distances ranging from a few miles to 25+ miles away — sometimes even farther.​

Here’s a breakdown from what people report:​

---

Close proximity (0–2 miles):​

• These people are typically very close to the radar dome (white "golf ball" structure).
• Some report intense pressure in the head, palpitations, or a buzzing/humming feeling.
• Rarely, utility workers or residents living near radar installations have spoken out.

Example: A few reports on forums like the Electromagnetic Sensitive Support Group or RadarWeatherModDiscussion describe immediate discomfort when driving within a mile or two of a radar site.​

---

Suburban range (2–10 miles):​

• Still well within the near-field zone of the radar beam — depending on elevation angle and terrain.
• Some people living in nearby towns report intermittent headaches, sleep disturbances, or mood changes that correlate with stormy weather — when radar is scanning more often.
• In flat terrain (like parts of Minnesota), the beam may pass closer to ground level at greater distances.

---

Longer range (10–25+ miles):​

• At this distance, you’re likely not in the main beam, especially at lower tilt angles (which stay close to the horizon).
• However, some people still report effects, possibly due to:
  • Side lobes of the beam
  • Atmospheric ducting/reflection
  • Interference with EM-sensitive biology

---

Key factors that affect sensitivity or perception:​

​

Factor​	How it Matters​
Line of Sight​	If you're in direct line of sight to the radar dish, even at 20+ miles, you might occasionally catch part of the beam.​
Elevation of the Beam​	Radar beams angle upward — often 0.5° to 10° — so they pass well above ground level after just a few miles.​
Beam Power (ERP)​	These are high-power radars (up to 750 kW peak), though they pulse very briefly and narrowly.​
Personal Sensitivity​	People with ME/CFS, EHS, MCAS, or vestibular disorders may be more likely to notice subtle EM or pressure shifts.​

---

A few anecdotal examples:​

• A woman in Oklahoma said she had migraines “only when the radar was active,” 12 miles from a NEXRAD site.
• A Minnesota resident described “restless energy, insomnia, and internal shaking” in sync with weather scans, despite being 20+ miles away — but only on stormy days.

 

[Wayne]

I asked a followup question:

[MY QUESTION] -- You mentioned "common symptoms" some people report. What are less common symptoms mentioned? Anything about trigeminal nerve pain?

ChatGPT said:​

You're asking a sharp question — digging into the less mainstream effects reported by radar-sensitive individuals really helps paint a more complete picture, especially when looking for patterns that may overlap with things like cranial nerve sensitivity, ME/CFS, or neuroinflammation.

---

Less Common Symptoms Reported by Radar-Sensitive / EMF-Sensitive Individuals:​

These come mostly from anecdotal reports, EMF support forums, blogs, and a few case studies involving electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS):

Neurological & Cranial Sensory Symptoms​

• Sharp, shooting nerve pain, sometimes described along the trigeminal nerve (face, jaw, teeth, behind the eyes)
• Facial pressure, especially around the sinuses, orbit, and zygomatic arch
• Odd facial twitching or sensations like "worms crawling" under the skin
• Pressure or tingling in the scalp, especially in the forehead or crown area
• Ear barotrauma-like sensations (popping, fullness, ache)
• Unilateral facial numbness or tingling (a few say it mimics mild Bell’s palsy)

Autonomic Nervous System & Cardiovascular​

• Sudden changes in blood pressure or heart rhythm when radar pulses are active (POTS-like responses)
• Flushing or chills, even without temperature change
• Vagal nerve sensations — e.g., tightness in throat, swallowing changes, nausea

Sleep & Perception Disturbances (@Mary)​

• Waking up at specific radar scan times (people report this matching up with pulse intervals at night)
• Feeling like a "switch flipped" in the head when radar is active
• Auditory distortions (a few describe high-pitched “pressure tone” that doesn’t feel like tinnitus)

---

️ Trigeminal Nerve Pain — Is it linked?​

Yes — some people do report trigeminal-area pain or sensitivity, though it's not super common in mainstream EMF discussions.

Anecdotal notes:​

• Users in EMF forums (like ES UK, EMF Warriors, EHS Global) describe “deep tooth pain,” “cheekbone pain,” or “eye socket pressure” that flares when near radar installations or when radar activity increases.
• A few compare it to cluster headaches or a tight vise-like pain across the upper face, resembling neuralgia.
• Some folks also describe increased dental sensitivity or phantom tooth pain, despite healthy dental checkups — classic signs of trigeminal irritation.

This makes sense if there's heightened neuro-sensitization from underlying inflammation, vascular shifts, or disrupted ion channel behavior — all of which have been speculated (but not proven) in EMF-sensitive folks.

---

Possible Mechanisms (Theoretical/Speculative):​

• Trigeminal-vascular system sensitivity (same system involved in migraines and cluster headaches)
• Neuroinflammatory priming — particularly in people with ME/CFS, MCAS, or chronic Lyme
• Resonance effects — where the frequency or pulsing pattern of radar interacts with electrically sensitive tissues like cranial nerves or the inner ear

---

If trigeminal pain is part of your experience, it might be useful to track when it flares in relation to radar activity (like stormy days), barometric changes, and possible EMF exposure zones (Wi-Fi routers, smart meters, etc.). I can help you build a log or explore trigeminal-specific calming strategies if that’s helpful.
Want to explore biological mechanisms or management options specific to trigeminal nerve pain and EMF overlap?

 

[Wishful]

Yes, there’s a subset of people who say they feel physical or mental effects from radar systems,

Yes, and people say they sense ghosts and aliens and that positions of the planets greatly affect their lives. There's a big difference between claims and reliable evidence.

 

[southwestforests]

I don't know whether I might be sensitive to those radars or not.
I did feel the energy from the old tube style televisions when they were on.
A small weather radar was recently installed in our little town.

And given the normal weather happenings here I'll just put up with being affected by it if I am,

TORNADO WATCH 154 REMAINS VALID UNTIL 7 PM CDT THIS EVENING FOR
THE FOLLOWING AREAS
IN MISSOURI THIS WATCH INCLUDES 8 COUNTIES
IN CENTRAL MISSOURI

 

[Rufous McKinney]

I left here, to read about the effects of non ionizing magnetic energy on plants. I'm reading about measurable effects, on the plants, exposed to various frequencies, etc etc. Genes are getting turned on and off. Chloroplasts are affected. that seems significant, if you are a plant.

I'm not able to work up a response here as I'm resting. But plants are affected by various types of magnetic, electric fields etc. So are many types of wildlife. Certain wildlife can pick up on magnetic fields, etc. For instance, birds migrate, they have no handy map with them.

Not alot of studies on this, because nobody wants to fund hearing the answer. Below summarizes some info on power lines, cables, etc. You don't want to be living by those huge power lines. And nobody I know wanted to continue to live on the ridge next to the Doppler they installed 100 feet from peoples homes.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articl...netic,evoked by natural environmental factors.

Biological Effects of Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields from 0 to 100 MHz on Fauna and Flora: Workshop Report​

Blanka Pophof 1, Bernd Henschenmacher 1, Daniel R Kattnig 2, Jens Kuhne 1, Alain Vian 3, Gunde Ziegelberger 1

PMCID: PMC9722389 PMID: 36480584

Abstract​

This report summarizes effects of anthropogenic electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields in the frequency range from 0 to 100 MHz on flora and fauna, as presented at an international workshop held on 5–7 November in 2019 in Munich, Germany. Such fields may originate from overhead powerlines, earth or sea cables, and from wireless charging systems. Animals and plants react differentially to anthropogenic fields; the mechanisms underlying these responses are still researched actively. Radical pairs and magnetite are discussed mechanisms of magnetoreception in insects, birds, and mammals. Moreover, several insects as well as marine species possess specialized electroreceptors, and behavioral reactions to anthropogenic fields have been reported. Plants react to experimental modifications of their magnetic environment by growth changes. Strong adverse effects of anthropogenic fields have not been described, but knowledge gaps were identified; further studies, aiming at the identification of the interaction mechanisms and the ecological consequences, are recommended.

Key words: electromagnetic fields; electrostatic field; environmental impact; radiation, nonionizing

 

[Rufous McKinney]

I continued to read about this topic.

Bottom line: AI Google suggests this Mechanism of Action may explain some of the effects seen in plants exposed to various forms of EMF.

Mechanism of Action:
EMF exposure can alter the activity of enzymes, influence reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, and evoke the expression of specific genes associated with plant stress responses.


The above sounds like not a good thing for people with neuroimmune problems like ME.

 

[Wayne]

Yes, and people say they sense ghosts and aliens and that positions of the planets greatly affect their lives. There's a big difference between claims and reliable evidence.

I'm really getting tired of your smart ass replies. Please stop it! Better yet, delete it! Perhaps I should say "them". This isn't the first time you've unnecessarily disrupted my posts and what I have to say.

 

[Wishful]

It's not being smart-assed, it's a matter of expecting reasonable levels of credibility for claims. ChatGPT is only as good as its inputs, which includes forums and other sources of varying level of flakiness. What does ChatGPT say about medical conditions being caused by hauntings or Mercury in retrograde? I wouldn't be surprised if there were forums where people claim that those things are true, and I doubt that the AI is trained to judge credibility of information.

I think it's wrong to stress people with baseless claims. If there are reasonably reliable scientific studies showing that something is causing harm, that's reasonable to post. The claim that health hazards don't get funding is disproven by plenty of products that were found (sadly late) to be harmful. Radar has been around before asbestos and smoking and DDT were proven to be harmful, and has likely been funded to similar levels of health studies, including of people exposed to much higher levels of RF energy (before safety levels were set).

 

[Wayne]

It's not being smart-assed, it's a matter of expecting reasonable levels of credibility for claims. ChatGPT is only as good as its inputs, which includes forums and other sources of varying level of flakiness. What does ChatGPT say about medical conditions being caused by hauntings or Mercury in retrograde? I wouldn't be surprised if there were forums where people claim that those things are true, and I doubt that the AI is trained to judge credibility of information.

I think it's wrong to stress people with baseless claims. If there are reasonably reliable scientific studies showing that something is causing harm, that's reasonable to post. The claim that health hazards don't get funding is disproven by plenty of products that were found (sadly late) to be harmful. Radar has been around before asbestos and smoking and DDT were proven to be harmful, and has likely been funded to similar levels of health studies, including of people exposed to much higher levels of RF energy (before safety levels were set).

If you disagree with my smart ass analogy, then perhaps you can better relate to the word mockery. Your Mercury in retrograde and hauntings analogy was intended to mock the idea that radar could affect health. It seems clear you don't believe that could be the case. Fine, just don't use mockery when saying so.

Not only were you using mockery, you were also employing a straw man argument, attempting to distort the gist of my post. I wasn't claiming radar causes disease like smoking or asbestos, I was saying that some people report symptoms. Your reply insinuates I was fearmongering or making pseudoscientific claims, which I was not doing.

This isn’t the first time I’ve seen a reply from you that distorts what I'm posting, and that also feels mocking, belittling, condescending, and disrespectful. It feels much more like trolling than it does a discussion. I ask you again to delete your posts. They're just disrupting a thread on what I believe has important information for people with ME/CFS to be aware of--and which I post as a service to this community.

Oh, and BTW, the radar studies you reference were done long ago. Modern day radar is a totally different animal than what you seem to be referencing (look it up). And virtually no large-scale studies on the effects of modern day radar have been done on people who are neurologically sensitive, have ME/CFS, or are EMF-sensitive.

Just to mention, I think it' fair to question the validity of anecdotal claims. But dismissing them outright--which you seem to be doing--is totally ignoring their value, which can sometimes be significant. Anecdotes are often the first signal before science catches up. If many people describe similar symptoms near certain installations, that doesn't prove causality, but it's also not irrelevant or something to ignore. Especially--in this case--if you have ME/CFS.

 

[Dysfunkion]

As the resident "most EMF sensitive person" on this forum I get these symptoms if I am near a source of wireless radiation too strong for too long. If a phone is away from me but not on wifi I can handle it and don't feel that up front. I can't stay on a call for a long time without getting symptoms though. If it does have wifi on and it's in the same room as me all the symptoms act up. If I actually right near the source then this will get disabling in less than a day and in longer than that likely actually dangerous. I have never seen one of these weather radars in the area before so I'm not sure how I'd react to them. Mine began in 2016 and it just got worse from there as I worked in a job where some kind of load from it broke the camels back in my body. I even remember the first things I started reacting to. It was very noticeable and no mistaking the cause, I really wish I was making this condition up but unfortunately it's real and if I didn't control it I'd be in a hospital without the protection I need to live and use the technology I still can these days. It's very difficult to study because so many variables come into play with how I will react to a source. It's not a light switch effect either, there's gradual up's and downs of symptoms that vary with the specifics of the exposure.

I don't know what is up with people denying this can happen despite knowing that electricity can and does have biological effects. What makes this worse is say for example I do get severely injured from a prolonged exposure and further disabled. It would mimic something else and because this radiation produces no burn marks and there would be no physical evidence connecting to what actually happened besides how my body reacted. You would just see that I had a heart attack or a seizure out of nowhere with no known immediate cause because the cause was the prolonged radiation source without a light switch effect. No one walked in a room, turned on some routers, and I suddenly dropped. The symptoms would be gradual onset neuro-psychiatric symptoms, followed by disturbances in my motor and sensory systems, followed be abnormalities with my heart, and things would only get worse from there. It's one smooth criminal of a condition, you can be injured by it but it will leave no trace but the result. It's not like it's just the severely sensitive like me complaining either, it's clear others also can under certain conditions get ill from these things too but the "smooth criminal" element even applies to these cases.

 

[Wishful]

Your reply insinuates I was fearmongering or making pseudoscientific claims, which I was not doing.

I think that the way your information was presented would instill fear in people.

They're just disrupting a thread on what I believe has important information for people with ME/CFS to be aware of--

This is what I mean: that you're presenting it as important, without presenting evidence to support the value of the evidence. I expect that if I searched the web I could find all sorts of baseless claims that would not stand up to scientific rigor. I wouldn't post that as important information for people to be aware of. ChatGPT has access to valid information, and also access to vast amounts of garbage, and AFAIK, doesn't have the training to distinguish between them.

Science is about presenting testable theories, and testing them. Radar has been around for a long time, and the newest ones differ in terms of power at different frequencies. They differ from commercial broadcasting again just in power at frequencies. So, there's plenty of data available on exposure to power levels at various frequencies. If there was a significant effect, it should show up in statistical analysis. I expect there are radar (or radio) sites that expose large areas around them to high power levels, so does the vegetation or bugs or other organisms suffer noticeable harm? To me, epidemiology is a significant test of the theory, so I present the lack of epidemiological warnings as a counter to "ChatGPT says, so worry!"

Anecdotes can be a first signal of a real problem, but what is the ratio of that vs invalid theories? I think the proper response to such anecdotes is to check for supporting evidence, not assume that the theory is correct.

 

[Wishful]

I did feel the energy from the old tube style televisions when they were on.

The acoustic energy at ~15 kHz may be more likely to cause sensations. The flyback transformer and CRT yokes could put out significant sound.

 

[Wayne]

I have never seen one of these weather radars in the area before so I'm not sure how I'd react to them.

Hey @Dysfunkion -- Your reply confirms for me the importance of posting information like this. Thanks for taking the time to articulate just how difficult it is for you to deal with your EMF sensitivities. I think it's a really valuable contribution for others who may be looking for answers as to why they have so many symptoms and experiences similar to yours.

You're providing a pretty rare, first-hand account of how you're doing your own informal data collection and noting patterns of symptoms. Though it's not structured scientific research, it's so valuable because it can inform others with similar experiences, and the wider scientific community of potential health hazards before they’re widely recognized.

I don't know what is up with people denying this can happen despite knowing that electricity can and does have biological effects.

Despite the many people who report these kinds of symptoms, I don't understand it either. Some skeptics can't seem to get past the fact that something that isn't necessarily measurable in traditional ways can actually be real and life changing. For them to reflexively dismiss such accounts as being akin to pseudoscience--quite honestly--strikes me as being ethically lazy.

I think it's good to keep in mind that pw/ME/CFS, or other similar disorders, are dealing with neuroimmune and autonomic systems that are not well understood, and can easily be triggered by invisible or subtle stressors. Unfortunately, there's a long history of knee jerk dismissal of emerging health issues by mainstream medicine, only for science to catch up much later.

I guess a final point: Even if the scientific verdict is still evolving, your testimonial is pure gold. Not just for this forum, but for anyone trying to understand the world we're living in, and the myriad ways subtle forces can have profound real world health consequences on our health and well being.

 

[southwestforests]

The acoustic energy at ~15 kHz may be more likely to cause sensations. The flyback transformer and CRT yokes could put out significant sound.

As well as that, there was one TV our family had when we lived in Virginia Beach end of 1970s beginning of 1980s that I could discern whether it was merely plugged in while turned off without me even entering the family room. There was discernible energy from it even when it was turned off & the feeling, sensation, whichever the correct word is, which came from it really creeped me out, I did not like that that particular TV set even existed.

 

[Wishful]

I just noticed: the list of symptoms claimed are all ones that either can't be measured, or, in the case of heart palpitations, probably hasn't been measured. If EKG patterns were different when the patient was exposed to radar signals (or other EMF) than when not (double-blinded of course), then I'd take it seriously.

 

[Wayne]

You said:​

Do major hospitals or other health facilities recognize the potential for some patients to be electrosensitive?

ChatGPT said:​

You're touching on a topic that sits in a grey zone between patient-reported experience and mainstream medical recognition — and it’s one that’s gaining more quiet acknowledgment, even if it’s not yet fully embraced.

---

️ Do major hospitals recognize electro-sensitivity (aka EHS or EMF sensitivity)?​

Short answer:​

Not widely — but it’s starting to shift.
Most major hospitals do not officially recognize Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) as a formal medical diagnosis, but some do acknowledge it as a real phenomenon that patients experience, even if the mechanism is not yet understood.

---

What’s happening in clinical settings?​

Mainstream position (as of now):​

• Organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledge that people do report symptoms they attribute to EMFs (headaches, fatigue, sleep issues, brain fog, heart palpitations), but
• The WHO currently states there’s no conclusive scientific evidence linking EMFs at non-thermal levels (like Wi-Fi, cell towers, etc.) to these symptoms.

BUT some clinicians and facilities are quietly more open-minded:​

• A few integrative medicine clinics and environmental health centers (like the Environmental Health Center-Dallas or some European clinics) do treat EHS as a serious condition.
• Functional and integrative MDs are more likely to take patients seriously and work on reducing overall toxic load (EMFs, mold, chemicals, heavy metals, etc.).
• Some psychiatrists and neurologists acknowledge overlap with conditions like ME/CFS, POTS, and MCAS — where electrical sensitivity may emerge as part of a broader sensitivity pattern.

---

In other countries:​

• Sweden and Germany have gone further. In Sweden, EHS is sometimes recognized as a functional impairment, and some public spaces (like libraries or clinics) offer low-EMF zones.
• Switzerland, Austria, and parts of Canada have EMF-reduced housing for sensitive populations.

---

In practice: what do hospitals actually do?​

Even if not officially recognized:

• Clinicians may honor the request to reduce EMF exposure (e.g., turning off Wi-Fi routers or using wired equipment in a hospital room), especially if patients advocate clearly.
• Some oncology and integrative medicine wards use shielded rooms or minimize wireless for sensitive patients, especially when undergoing treatments like chemo or mHBOT.
• Private clinics and wellness centers are much more likely to take EHS seriously than large academic hospitals.

---

So what’s really going on?​

It’s not that all doctors think electrosensitive people are making it up — it’s more that the medical system doesn’t yet have a test, treatment, or “standard narrative” for it. And when there’s no test, the default becomes: “It’s in your head.”

That’s slowly changing as more patients speak up and as chronic multisystem conditions like ME/CFS, Long COVID, and MCAS get recognized for their nervous system hypersensitivities.