Thank you, Tristen. I think the folks who want to throw Dr. Peterson out with the bathwater, so to speak, because of an unknown dispute with people at WPI, should take a look at his historical involvement with this illness. At no point has he ever shown evidence of being "in it for the money." In fact, you could probably say he's thrown away any chance of being wealthy or respected in the world of Big Medicine because of his dedication to what was named CFS by the CDC after they visited the practice of Cheney & Peterson in Incline Village to see those weird patients back in the '80s. I understand folks wanting WPI's findings to be the final word. Maybe they will be. But that doesn't mean that they are the only Good people, and anyone they argue with is Bad. It strikes me as odd (but human, I guess) that with the arrival on the scene of Mikovits et al just last year, suddenly the WPI is the arbiter of truth, and all the dedicated, but underfunded researchers and clinicians who've been doing work in this field for decades are suddenly chopped liver. Don't misread me, I hope that the HGRV findings are real, and I see more and more evidence that they are. But, that doesn't mean everyone else is wrong, or misguided. Everyone's feeling a different part of the elephant.