There is an old salesman's trick. You say some obviously right things, and make sure the mark, umm, the customer agrees. Then you say some slightly less obvious things, and get agreement. By the time you get to the punchline, or at least that is the theory, the sucker, ummm, customer, is ready to agree to anything. The sale is made - unless you suck at selling, or the mark, ummm, customer sees through it.
This is used in psychogenic and related literature. It is persuasive rhetoric devoid of evidence and reason ... except in enough bits to give it a gloss of verisimilitude. It appeals to prejudice, that is pre-judgement, and ignorance, or lack of knowledge. Without sufficient knowledge and with pre-formed opinion in the absence of good facts, even doctors are vulnerable.
I have also been reflecting on claims made by some doctors that they practice evidence based medicine. For some I think this is accurate. For others, and probably most who make the claim, I think they do not understand what evidence based medicine is, its being used as a rubber stamp to authoritative claims. I also think that some published Cochrane reviews have not come to grips with what evidence based medicine is.
The medical profession is between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand they must save money and not do tests and push patients through fast without proper investigation, and are never given time or resources to properly update their knowledge. On the other hand they are expected to get results, to cure or successfully treat patients, and even know what they are talking about. These two extremes are sometimes incompatible.
I have a suspicion that a proper economic analysis needs to be done to see if ignorance, buck passing and failure to perform adequate testing, and hence leading to misdiagnosis, costs much more money in the long run than anything saved. I suspect its the far more expensive option. I suspect that this is a case of musical chairs, and they keep shuffling patients around, at ever greater cost, until the music stops. Then they pass them onto the next circle of chairs, often a psychiatric circle.
If the medical profession and bean counters came to grips with reality and were honest then I think things would work a lot better. This is just a suspicion, but its way overdue for bureaucrats and medical decision makers in government to get a good dose of reality.
In an ideal world we would already have obvious tests to assess ME patients, and good treatments. Alas, this world is not ideal.