• Phoenix Rising needs funds to operate: please consider donating to support PR

Connectivity within the brainstem is impaired in chronic fatigue syndrome

Messages
1,445
Likes
7,266
Connectivity within the brainstem is impaired in chronic fatigue syndrome

Presented During: Poster Session
Thursday, June 13, 2019: 12:45 PM - 02:45 PM

Authors:

Leighton Barnden1, Zack SHAN1, Donald Staines1, Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik1, Kevin Finegan2, Timothy Ireland2, Sandeep Bhuta2

Institutions:

1Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 2Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

Introduction:

Chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS) is a common, debilitating, multisystem disorder of uncertain pathogenesis, for which there exists evidence of dysregulation of the central nervous system (Carruthers. 2011). Quantitative T1wSE and T2wSE MRI studies of CFS have reported abnormal correlations with severity and autonomic measures which implied brainstem conduction deficits (Barnden. 2015, Barnden. 2016). The aim of this study was to directly measure connectivity within the brainstem (midbrain, pons and medulla) to confirm these implied deficits.

Methods:

Resting-state and Stroop-task functional MRI (rsfMRI and tfMRI) studies with companion hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were acquired for 27 healthy control (HC) and 45 chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) subjects who met Fukuda criteria.

Each fMRI consisted of 1100 sagittal images and was acquired for 15 minutes on a 3T Siemens Skyra with a simultaneous multi-slice echo-planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence(Auerbach. 2013) with 72 slices, multiband factor = 8, TR = 798 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 40°, acquisition matrix = 106 x 106, and voxel size 2 x 2 x 2 mm. Given that this study was focused on connectivity within the brain stem whereas routine spatial normalization of fMRI is focused on the cerebral cortex, we optimized spatial normalization for alignment of the brain stem.

A two-stage normalization strategy was performed on the single band reference (SBRef) images which were acquired before the 1100 fMRI volumes. Stage I was a 9DF deformation to the MNI T2 template constrained to 20° rotation for all 3 axes using FSL's 'flirt'. The 9DF accounted for individual magnification differences and angular constraints prevented some grossly inaccurate deformations.

For stage II, a mask was manually created using FSL's 'fslview' to isolate the brainstem and thalamus (Fig 1A). This mask excluded the ventral half of the pons and medulla where variable signal dropout/distortion was seen (Fig 1C). The deformed images from stage I were then further deformed with 6DF (rigid) to the T2 template within this thalamus-brainstem mask, again with 20° angular constraints.

The two deformations were then merged and applied to the 1100 EPI images. ROIs (Fig 1B) were constructed for the brainstem left and right medulla (Mdul_L, Mdul_R) and midbrain cuneiform nucleus (CnF_L, CnF_R) based on locations where abnormal CFS autonomic regressions were detected earlier (Barnden. 2016); and for the left and right hippocampus subiculum (subic_L and subic_R) which have medulla connections (Edlow. 2016). BOLD fMRI time series were computed for these ROIs and de-noised using 15 RETROICOR covariates derived from the physiological measures with the PhysIO toolbox (Kasper. 2017) and QA and principle components of white matter and CSF BOLD variations from the CONN toolbox (Whitfield-Gabrieli. 2012). Second-level testing for group difference in connectivities were then performed with CONN.


Fig 1A: Brainstem+thalamus mask to exclude ventral medulla & pons dropout (see C). B: Mdul_L&R, CnF_L&R and subic_L&R ROIs. C: Stem normalised tfMRI images of 6 subjects with Mdul_R, CnF_R ROIs.

Results:

For the task fMRI, group connectivity differences were found between Mdul_R and CnF_L (FDR-corrected P = 0.003) – see Fig 2; Mdul_L and CnF_L (0.004); and Mdul_R and subic_L (0.007). No connectivitiy differences were found in the resting state fMRI.


Fig 2 Connectivity between 3 pairs of nodes was significantly different for CFS and HC groups. Mdul_R right medulla; CnF_L left cuneiform nucleus; subic_L subiculum of left hippocampus.

Conclusions:

Significant differences were found between CFS and HC for connectivity within the brainstem between the rostral medulla and midbrain cuneiform nucleus and between the rostral medulla and subiculum of the left hippocampus. Impaired brainstem connectivity can explain reported autonomic and compensatory structural changes in CFS (Barnden. 2015, 2016), and may also explain the impaired cognitive performance, sleep quality and pain of CFS. The fast 0.798s multiband fMRI used here yielded suboptimal brainstem image quality although it will have provided superior physiological artefact correction. Studies with improved image quality may yield deeper insights into the nature and location of brainstem conduction deficits in CFS.
Disorders of the Nervous System:

Disorders of the Nervous System Other 1
Imaging Methods:

BOLD fMRI
Modeling and Analysis Methods:

fMRI Connectivity and Network Modeling 2
Keywords:

Brainstem

Cognition

Data Registration

Degenerative Disease

FUNCTIONAL MRI

Sleep

Sub-Cortical


1|2Indicates the priority used for review
My abstract is being submitted as a Software Demonstration.
No Please indicate below if your study was a "resting state" or "task-activation” study.
Resting state Task-activation Healthy subjects only or patients (note that patient studies may also involve healthy subjects):
Patients Was any human subjects research approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board or ethics panel? NOTE: Any human subjects studies without IRB approval will be automatically rejected.
Yes Was any animal research approved by the relevant IACUC or other animal research panel? NOTE: Any animal studies without IACUC approval will be automatically rejected.
Not applicable Please indicate which methods were used in your research:
Functional MRI For human MRI, what field strength scanner do you use?
3.0T Provide references using author date format
Auerbach, E. J., J. Xu, E. Yacoub, S. Moeller and K. Ugurbil (2013). ‘Multiband accelerated spin-echo echo planar imaging with reduced peak RF power using time-shifted RF pulses.’ Magnetic Resonance in Medicine vol 69, no. 5, pp. 1261-1267.
Barnden, L. (2015). ‘Evidence in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for severity-dependent upregulation of prefrontal myelination that is independent of anxiety and depression.’ NMR in Biomedicine, 28, no.3, pp. 404-413.
Barnden, L. (2016). ‘Autonomic correlations with MRI are abnormal in the brainstem vasomotor centre in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.’ NeuroImage: Clinical, vol 11, pp. 530-537.
Carruthers, B. (2011). ‘Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria.’ Journal of Internal Medicine, vol 270, pp 327-338.
Edlow, B. L. (2016). ‘The Structural Connectome of the Human Central Homeostatic Network.’ Brain Connectivity, vol 6, no. 3, pp. 187-200.
Kasper, L. (2017). ‘The PhysIO Toolbox for Modeling Physiological Noise in fMRI Data.’ Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol 276, pp. 56-72.
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. (2012). ‘Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks.’ Brain Connectivity vol 2, no. 3, pp. 125-141.
 

mariovitali

Senior Member
Messages
1,122
Likes
1,267
What i do not understand is whether there appears to be also a structural abnormality although an fMRI suggests that they are looking at blood flow.

These are very encouraging results i believe. Please see my tweets on the subject below. machine Learning identified the Brainstem along with acetylcholine and cholinergic signalling :

JenB Tweet.png
 

Wishful

Senior Member
Messages
2,023
Likes
3,439
Encouraging they see something. But is this a dead end for treatment?
Not at all. Temporary remissions show that ME is reversible in a very short time frame (hours if not minutes). During one of these remissions, those parts of the brain probably switch to normal healthy function. I see this new finding as more data to help point to whatever is malfunctioning. If they get enough data of this type, they can hopefully figure out which chemical is out of balance, and then how to restore that.
 

ljimbo423

Senior Member
Messages
2,521
Likes
5,988
Location
United States, New Hampshire
Encouraging they see something. But is this a dead end for treatment? Have they ever suggested a possible remedy of any kind?
This looks to me like they are saying, basically, the brain isn't working right in the areas they mention. It doesn't look like they are saying this a structural issue but maybe a blood flow issue. It might be inflammation causing it, as Jarred Younger has found.

Jarred Thinks that the brain inflammation and issues are caused by immune activation from the body. He is doing a study this year to see if B and T cells from the body are getting into the brain and causing this inflammation.

He says they shouldn't be able to get through the blood brain barrier, unless it's compromised and more "leaky" than it should be. If he finds these B or T cells from the body are causing the brain issues.

He's going to try to trace the B and T cells back to where they originate in the body, which could be the actual cause of CFS. That would allow very focused research into treatment of the actual cause of CFS.
 

Inara

Senior Member
Messages
254
Likes
611
Jarred Thinks that the brain inflammation and issues are caused by immune activation from the body. He is doing a study this year to see if B and T cells from the body are getting into the brain and causing this inflammation.
This made me think: It would be interesting to know if mast cells play a role here (mast cells on the brain side also regulate the BBB). Would this make sense at all, i.e. could (dysregulated) mast cells explain this connectivity problem and the inflammation Jarred Younger found?
 
Messages
1,445
Likes
7,266

Hip

Senior Member
Messages
13,348
Likes
25,169
Did they say what type of connectivity they measured in this study? According to this Wikipedia article,
Connectivity can be considered at different levels of the brain's organisation: from neurons, to neural assemblies and brain structures.
So connectivity can mean anything from neuron to neuron connections, to long-distance pathways between different areas of the brain.
 

Marylib

Senior Member
Messages
535
Likes
208
Admins, please feel free to move to where you feel it belongs. I think it is a new take on something that may seem counter-intuitive in terms of brain-stem function and connectivity.

"Dr Leighton Barnden and NCNED Researchers have just published a novel significant paper.

The research paper published in Neuroimage: Clinical reported 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗘/𝗖𝗙𝗦 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀. 𝗗𝗿 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗡𝗖𝗡𝗘𝗗 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 (𝗥𝗔𝗦) 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿. 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆, 𝗰𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝘆𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗼𝗺𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗘/𝗖𝗙𝗦.

𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸: https://www.sciencedirect.com/…/artic…/pii/S2213158219303924
Ion channels are located in this region and others of the brain.
𝗧𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝘅 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗠𝗿 𝗗𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗹𝗮𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝘁𝘁, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝘂𝘀𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗠𝗿 𝗔𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸, 𝗠𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗿𝘀 𝗜𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗧𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗶 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝘁, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗛𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘅𝘁𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘁 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝗘 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗤𝗟𝗗 𝗠𝗘/𝗖𝗙𝗦/𝗙𝗠 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗤𝗟𝗗 𝗜𝗻𝗰, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗖𝗧 𝗠𝗘/𝗖𝗙𝗦 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗪𝗔 𝗠𝗘/𝗖𝗙𝗦."

https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2213158219303924-gr1_lrg.jpg
 
Last edited:

Marylib

Senior Member
Messages
535
Likes
208
Sorry. I just saw this paper was released today. If it is confusing, I hope the admins can help. Someone released a news article saying the paper was coming and then the full paper was published, I think. @pattismith

To make my jumble even worse, they are talking about ion channels again. :)
 
Last edited:

Marylib

Senior Member
Messages
535
Likes
208
@Mary - maybe we need a single thread about all this fast research coming out of Griffith University in Australia. :)
I have been posting on another thread specifically related to the calcium ion channels and the NK cells. This thread is about the brain imaging studies from that group. At least I think so! :)
 
Messages
3,355
Likes
8,425
Sorry. I just saw this paper was released today. If it is confusing, I hope the admins can help. Someone released a news article saying the paper was coming and then the full paper was published, I think. @pattismith
Today, all I could do is make note that- yes, lets add another study confirming the awful ness of this malaise.

And I can't translate any of that either...my eyes, blurred, thought all those words on the page look impressive.

I do not get why our stunning levels of inflammation cannot be brought down.