Science laughs at "subjective measurements"
Alas "subjective" is needed for the complexity of human illness and the experience of it, but, if you cannot
objectively measure it, it's all
HEARSAY!
Show objective measurement, or admit it's just hearsay
if they won't admit that, then it's "snake oil medicine".
If it's hearsay you treat it VERY cautiously and admit such, still maybe useful when nothing else is of help, but you don't "beat the drum" and pronounce it a "cure/treatment"
You cannot treat horrible diseases with bloody hearsay and get away with it, except with psychiatry/psychology, because any other are the doctor would get stuck off or even jailed.
That's it in a nut shell.
using psychology to help a patient deal with a health problem is perfectly valid and humane
But the CBT/biosocial lot, are
ideologically driven, NOT driven by the genuine welfare of the patient
it is therefor unsurprising there are differences because it is NOT objective and no way to admit or quantify the different approaches etc has on the patient's psychology
Team A maybe arrogant boors
Team B maybe humane and empathic
etc
more "Nero fiddles while Rome burns", that's what this is :/