i agree with
@prioris
would add archeology, psychology to the list. which still wouldnt be complete.
to be wrong or imprecise with a hypotheses or an analysis or a measurement is normal, probably essential. it may serve other fields. its part of the human/natures design. in addition, new advances from other techno-fields (should) give better data and help improving theories.
there should be a "timeline" with every event, discovery.
if there was reasonable logic applied.
though, totally gross is, for how long false believes are followed by "science". no timeline.
hypotheses are ridiculous, hold less and less water, though go uncontested for centuries.
unquestionied.
imo, this is reason for "diseases" like mecfs, alzheimers, cancer...
till today, they have not understand how the "body" works.
they are unable to make a full and clear body model, with its substances, building blocks, function ...
moreover, they should be able, to analyze all this from every patient with technology.
if they could, wouldnt it be easy to set up a full body model, individual ones?
but hey, search for a metabolic trap.
in 2019 they aint ashamed to pose for pics, shaking colorful glass tubes, like 500 years ago.
im not often at doctors offices. but when, i feel beamed back hundreds of years. e.g. eye doctor, ENT.
gross. embarrassing.
the others are like staffis that just wont let go their odd bacteria and viruses theories.
we just let it happen.