And your inexpensive ozone treatment in no way equates with what I've observed first hand of 10 Pass ozone and UVBI.
You may be right that my inexpensive technique may not compare to ozone major autohemotherapy (10 pass ozone is a form of that), or to UV blood irradiation; although it would be interesting to have someone who has benefited from major autohemotherapy for say Lyme disease to also try my method, and compare the results. My method is so much cheaper.
I am rather suspicious of these private ozone therapists who charge high prices for ozone treatment, and who claim their treatment is of benefit, but do not publish their supposed good results in scientific journals.
If you think about the way major autohemotherapy is performed, it is clear that it cannot work by an antibacterial or antiviral action. In major autohemotherapy, only around 200 ml of blood is drawn from the body and treated with ozone, before being returned to the body. But that 200 ml is just a fraction of the 5 liters of blood in the body, and an even smaller faction of the total of around 50 liters of fluid in the body.
So even if ozone did have an antibacterial effect on the bacteria in that 200 ml of blood (which it doesn't), it's not really going to work for the bacteria found in the rest of the 50 liters of fluid in the body, because you are only treating 200 ml out of the total body fluids.
Thus if ozone major autohemotherapy does have any benefit in viral or bacteria diseases, it would have to be by some other mechanism, like reducing reactive oxygen species, or by an immune stimulating mechanism.
From a
paper by Bocci about ozone major autohemotherapy:
It was postulated that the small percentage of immunocytes activated ex vivo by H2O2, via NFkB may transfer the activation in vivo after the infusion of ozonated blood into the donor patient. Indeed, after blood infusion into the donor, the activated lymphocytes, by releasing cytokines, can activate other cells in vivo. If this is true, repeated therapeutic sessions may indeed reverse a condition of immune-depression.
Actually these observations have suggested to use ozone therapy in both acute and chronic bacterial and viral infections keeping in mind that all pathogens, either free in the plasma or located intracellularly, are paradoxically well protected by the potent antioxidant capacity of blood and cells.
This is so, because with the ozone concentration established by the therapeutic index, neither ozone or its messengers can deliver a bactericidal or virucidal effect. Indeed, contrary to what is commonly believed, ozone can act only as a supportive therapy in infectious diseases and we know already that both HIV and chronic hepatitis C infections cannot be proficiently treated only with ozone therapy unless we simultaneously combined with the appropriate dosages of antiviral drugs.
