This is a response to Kati. Indeed, patients in Canada would have to organize and ask for compassionate access to this drug. However, as you may know the Canadian medical system is crumbling. Many folks do not have a family doctor. Furthermore, treatments for complex illnesses are simply not available. I don't want to stray off the topic of this announcement today by the Norwegian physicians. But I do want to mention that the system in Canada is in crises--although folks elsewhere often are not aware of what is happening. And middle upper class and upper class folks go to the US or to Europe for treatment. It may have to do with the small population and the skyrocketing prices in medical care, not to mention inefficiency, but I suspect the Canadian government would baulk at requests for this med. A highly mobilized organization of people might make some difference, but it would take a dog's age.
True about autoimmunity being poorly understood but by being in a disease category that receives mounds of biomedical research funds is much better than being in a new/unknown disease category that receives next to nothing.Nice. But you know what bugs me? The Answer autoimmun disease. Thats basically another word for we don't know. There so many autoimmun diseases out there and still new stuff appears to be cause by autoimmun diseases. And noone knows whats causing this. Personally I don't see autoimmun disease as a real answer.
I'm Skeptical, This all started because they had a patient who had Hodgkins lymphoma and also had a diagnosis of CFS. Which as a side note just goes to show what a Wastebasket diagnosis CFS is. Applying a CFS diagnosis to Hodgkin's Lymphoma which has severer fatigue as a component is absurd. It completely defeats the purported purpose of even creating CFS to begin with. But I digress.
It just seems funny that the whole JM & WPI XMRV issue involved a retrovirus that is purported to have an association with a type of cancer. So we now have these doctors who give someone with Lymphoma who also has the Diagnosis of CFS Rituximab.
Now if ME which is what many with the CFS diagnosis have is caused by a retrovirus that can cause or play a role in the development of cancer or various cancers. Then it seems that giving this drug could and would act as a mask (if you will) and as a result you run the risk of not looking for cancers which could have deadly results for the patient.
But we'll easily know if this is part of the establishment agenda towards ME/CFS. If The usually suspects begin to attack those Doctors their assertions and this potential treatment then we'll have our answer.
From Wikipedia. The term somatic (from the Greek ?????????) means 'of the body',[1], relating to the body. In medicine, somatic illness is bodily, not mental, illness.
What Max said. I'm Canadian... I could probably stand the Norwegian winter. And heck, if my ME/CFS husband improved we could xc ski again. In the meantime I think I'll try to dig up someone at the local university (UofAlberta - Judy had an interesting meeting here, and I'm hoping her comment about Canadian institution might have been one here) and see if anyone wants to do a trial, as surely this won't come through our regular, crumbling, system."Go Norway"
Hi, all.
I think this is a very interesting development, and I want to suggest what I think is going on when Rituximab is used to treat ME/CFS.
It will probably come as no surprise to those familiar with my history here that I will propose a mechanism that fits with the GD-MCB hypothesis for the pathophysiology of ME/CFS.
O.K., here it goes:
Based on the body of immunological studies that have been done in ME/CFS over quite a few years, we know that the immune system is dysfunctional in this disorder. In particular, it has a pronounced shift to the Th2 type of response, away from cell-mediated immunity.
The NK cells and the cytotoxic (CD8) killer-T cells are ineffective, partly because they are unable to produce enough perforin to punch holes in cells that are infected with viruses. Since this is the main mechanism normally used to knock out viral infections, these infections cannot be knocked out.
The immune system is forced to use its fall-back mechanisms, which are the humoral immune response (antibodies produced in Th2 by the B cells, which become plasma cells, and the interferon-induced mechanisms, including RNase-L).
These are less effective and are not able to completely knock out viral infections (The cell-mediated cavalry never arrives). This is the reason for the ongoing guerrilla war in the person's body, with both the reactivated viruses which have been in the body in the latent state, and with new ones that come along and infect the person after the onset of ME/CFS
As has been noted, the B cells do produce proinflammatory cytokines, which of course promote inflammation. Because most PWCs also have a dysfunctional HPA axis, cortisol tends to be low, and the inflammation is allowed to intensify to a higher level than normal.
Note that one of the main features of inflammation is oxidative stress, because cells of the immune system produce oxidizing species to attack the body's enemies. Oxidative stress is well-documented in ME/CFS, with perhaps 20 published papers reporting evidence of it now.
And those familiar with the body's antioxidant system will know that when a state of oxidative stress is present, the antioxidant system is losing the battle between oxidants and antioxidants.
Those familiar will also know that glutathione is the basis of the antioxidant enzyme system in the body. So now we come to realize that in the subset of PWMEs/PWCs in whose bodies infection is a major aspect of their illness, we can expect that a major part of the oxidative stress, and hence a major part of the demand on glutathione, will be due to inflammation, which is being stimulated by the B cells in the overactive Th2 immune response.
O.K., so now we put in Rituximab, which kills the B cells. What happens?
Well, the inflammatory cytokines drop down, as does inflammation. This lowers the oxidative stress, taking a big demand off glutathione, which is then able to rise to at least some degree.
Aficionados of the GD-MCB hypothesis will immediately suspect that a big part of the symptomatology of ME/CFS will diminish, since the causes of a large fraction, perhaps the majority, of ME/CFS symptoms can be traced directly to the depletion of glutathione.
So voila! The patient feels better, until her/his B cells grow back, and the whole process repeats itself, making her/him miserable again. So we hit the patient with another dose of Rituximab, and she/he bounces back up, and so on. If we do succeed in permanently devastating the B cells, what happens in the longer term? Certainly they were there for a purpose. Will the body be adequately defended against its enemies in the future? I think that's a big question.
The main point I want to make is that this treatment, like many others that have been used or proposed for ME/CFS, addresses a down-stream issue in the pathophysiology, and does not get to the root of the problem, which I believe (and have evidence to support this belief) is a vicious circle mechanism that includes glutathione depletion, a functional deficiency of vitamin B12, a partial block of methionine synthase in the methylation cycle, and draining of folates from the cells. So far, the only way it seems to be possible to break this vicious cycle is to lift the partial block in the methylation cycle with appropriate treatment that includes simultaneous use of active forms of folate and high dosage of forms of vitamin B12. Among other effects, this should rebalance the immune system, so that the B cells as well as the other components of the immune system will return to their normal functions. I do need to add that some other things will likely need to be done as well to help this process along, and which things will depend on the details of each case. But lifting the partial methylation cycle block is the fundamental thing that needs to be done.
I would welcome any criticisms of this proposed mechanism. As far as I can tell, everything fits together well.
If anyone wants to get more information on the GD-MCB hypothesis, I recommend watching the video at
http://iaomt.media.fnf.nu/2/skovde_2011_me_kroniskt_trotthetssyndrom/$%7Bweburl%7D
The slides from the talk are available there too, if you don't want to hang in for the whole 3-plus hours.
Best regards,
Rich
Which as a side note just goes to show what a Wastebasket diagnosis CFS is. Applying a CFS diagnosis to Hodgkin's Lymphoma which has severer fatigue as a component is absurd.
and, hmmmmm. Your thinking still fascinates, Rich ... Maybe a bit of Rituximab to gather some strength and courage,(both of which are rather depleted) then get to work on the methylation cycle?
Hi, all.
I think this is a very interesting development, and I want to suggest what I think is going on when Rituximab is used to treat ME/CFS.
It will probably come as no surprise to those familiar with my history here that I will propose a mechanism that fits with the GD-MCB hypothesis for the pathophysiology of ME/CFS.
O.K., here it goes:
Based on the body of immunological studies that have been done in ME/CFS over quite a few years, we know that the immune system is dysfunctional in this disorder. In particular, it has a pronounced shift to the Th2 type of response, away from cell-mediated immunity.
The NK cells and the cytotoxic (CD8) killer-T cells are ineffective, partly because they are unable to produce enough perforin to punch holes in cells that are infected with viruses. Since this is the main mechanism normally used to knock out viral infections, these infections cannot be knocked out.
The immune system is forced to use its fall-back mechanisms, which are the humoral immune response (antibodies produced in Th2 by the B cells, which become plasma cells), and the interferon-induced mechanisms, including RNase-L.
These are less effective and are not able to completely knock out viral infections (The cell-mediated cavalry never arrives). This is the reason for the ongoing guerrilla war in the person's body, with both the reactivated viruses which have been in the body in the latent state, and with new ones that come along and infect the person after the onset of ME/CFS
As has been noted, the B cells do produce proinflammatory cytokines, which of course promote inflammation. Because most PWCs also have a dysfunctional HPA axis, cortisol tends to be low, and the inflammation is allowed to intensify to a higher level than normal.
Note that one of the main features of inflammation is oxidative stress, because cells of the immune system produce oxidizing species to attack the body's enemies. Oxidative stress is well-documented in ME/CFS, with perhaps 20 published papers reporting evidence of it now.
And those familiar with the body's antioxidant system will know that when a state of oxidative stress is present, the antioxidant system is losing the battle between oxidants and antioxidants.
Those familiar will also know that glutathione is the basis of the antioxidant enzyme system in the body. So now we come to realize that in the subset of PWMEs/PWCs in whose bodies infection is a major aspect of their illness, we can expect that a major part of the oxidative stress, and hence a major part of the demand on glutathione, will be due to inflammation, which is being stimulated by the B cells in the overactive Th2 immune response.
O.K., so now we put in Rituximab, which kills the B cells. What happens?
Well, the inflammatory cytokines drop down, as does inflammation. This lowers the oxidative stress, taking a big demand off glutathione, which is then able to rise to at least some degree.
Aficionados of the GD-MCB hypothesis will immediately suspect that a big part of the symptomatology of ME/CFS will diminish, since the causes of a large fraction, perhaps the majority, of ME/CFS symptoms can be traced directly to the depletion of glutathione.
So voila! The patient feels better, until her/his B cells grow back, and the whole process repeats itself, making her/him miserable again. So we hit the patient with another dose of Rituximab, and she/he bounces back up, and so on. If we do succeed in permanently devastating the B cells, what happens in the longer term? Certainly they were there for a purpose. Will the body be adequately defended against its enemies in the future? I think that's a big question.
The main point I want to make is that this treatment, like many others that have been used or proposed for ME/CFS, addresses a down-stream issue in the pathophysiology, and does not get to the root of the problem, which I believe (and have evidence to support this belief) is a vicious circle mechanism that includes glutathione depletion, a functional deficiency of vitamin B12, a partial block of methionine synthase in the methylation cycle, and draining of folates from the cells. So far, the only way it seems to be possible to break this vicious cycle is to lift the partial block in the methylation cycle with appropriate treatment that includes simultaneous use of active forms of folate and high dosage of forms of vitamin B12. Among other effects, this should rebalance the immune system, so that the B cells as well as the other components of the immune system will return to their normal functions. I do need to add that some other things will likely need to be done as well to help this process along, and which things will depend on the details of each case. But lifting the partial methylation cycle block is the fundamental thing that needs to be done.
I would welcome any criticisms of this proposed mechanism. As far as I can tell, everything fits together well.
If anyone wants to get more information on the GD-MCB hypothesis, I recommend watching the video at
http://iaomt.media.fnf.nu/2/skovde_2011_me_kroniskt_trotthetssyndrom/$%7Bweburl%7D
The slides from the talk are available there too, if you don't want to hang in for the whole 3-plus hours.
Best regards,
Rich