right, NIH will point to SoK and the BWG studies. We need to be able to argue that, one-time and occasional events aside, the ongoing allotment is the important part.
Talking points (you may want to pick just one; it's advised to keep it short and sweet but in any case not to run over a single page with normal margins)
compare less than $6 mil (her figure, which is a bit high) to $144 for MS (still underfunded) and $500 for Alzheimers (similarly complex, debilitating, and not well understood, but unlike the other two, not disproportionately affecting women). meanwhile, MS and Alzheimers have FDA-approved treatments, while ME does not.
Intramural research (CDC) is spent on chronic fatigue, not CFS, but published under the title of CFS, and also some funds are unable to be accounted for. Also some of the research is pejorative towards patients.
Exramural research (NIH grants) are approved by a committee which normally has no experts qualified to assess the biomedical research needed, and some of the members hold pejorative views towards patients. Indeed, the NIH recently invited one Dr.
Myra McClure, who doesn't even know how to use controls. (She left when it became apparent she wasn't wanted, but this is what NIH thinks of us.)