No it doesn't. To know if there's any impact, you have to read the research regarding each SNP
It MAY or MAY not, would be a better (polite) answer to that. Research does not say anything of the burden on the gene if there is more than one (in this case 9) mutation in it. If there is evidence for that, I want to know. I know there is for some rare "deseases", but not for every combinations out there.
I asume that we all know that the total combination of genes in a person makes it unike. Mentaly, physically etc. Also combinations of mutations in each gene would therefore be unike, and expressed diffrently in each person.
In my opinion every single SNP MAY have som kind of inpact on each person, and the combination of his mutations could have an patological inpact if the combination is not a good one. Nobody knows that for sure today.
What really makes me sad is that researchers make their statements by researching people that have messed their lifes up with poisening all their life. From the day they bread their first oxygene, it start to put in whatever that smells and taste good. Human beeing are the only species on earth that think they can eat everything and go through their lifes without symptoms of it. Alcohole, sugar, grains, milk, drugs and you name it. its not even strange that we early in our lifes start to "feel" bad. Before we can make scientific evidence for this and that we should first start to research on healthy people, if there are one left.

You can not say that this gene gives a person more chanse of a desease, when the real truth is that "with this gene you have got, you cant live like you have done up today". You have to give your gene what it was suposed to have. We cant supplement with nutritions because we want to go on with our wrong lifestyles. First step will be to fix that issue, and then we can start to play with genes that struggles to keep going normal. But everyone should know that it took X years before feeling sick, and it will take the same X years to be as quick as you where. Its not done in one week.
The statement is brutal, but every forum I am into I feel that everybody is needing for a quick fix, and they dose theire medications/nutrition as if it where water. Its not that easy.
I also have a lot of mutations in GAD1 gene, and 2 of them rarer than 3%. I know this gene is killing me, because all researching i have read fits me perfectly. Yes, I truely believe that if you got the symptoms that researcers have found for those 9 genes, it may well have some inpact on you all together. For me every medication that hits the GABAA or GABAB receptors does wonders in some variation. Everything else kills me. Too much GABA for a normal person wil NOT feel good. So everybody does not feel good om GABA medications.
Low GABA will often manifest with more pain, stiffness, feeling of inner turmoil, anxiety. Severe low GABA could lead to stiff man syndrome wich is a rare autoimmune desease. GABA is calmness in both mental state and body generally.
Neurontin (GABAA) and Baclofen (GABAB) has helped me before I got ME/CFS, after that I have not used it steady. I'm too sick to participate in social life, and wont use it if i dont need it. Those medications should be used in low doses over time, because they build up GABA over time. A dose that you almost not feel will be best. In my opinion. Yes, it will also be addictive over time as all GABA medicine is. I will start to try FMN (riboflavin variant) soon, as a last try to heal my GABA problems. Thanks to @
ppodhajski for his studies and experience with that protocol.
Well, thanks for listening.
