http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/586/2064/chronic-fatigue-disposition-150416.pdf
Start:
Jennie Spotila just highlighted this on her blog: http://www.occupycfs.com/2015/05/29/running-in-the-background/
I don't recall seeing it before but I don't read all the threads on Phoenix Rising
It's a long document:
http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/586/2064/chronic-fatigue-disposition-150416.pdf
Some times it can be interesting to read about particular experts' views. For example, I found it interesting to read all sorts of weird and wonderful views Peter White had in the comments on the draft NICE guidelines (read here: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/inde...ice-guidelines-insight-into-their-views.1239/) and see that he has comments in the AHRQ document. If anyone sees anything of potential interest, perhaps you could post them as I imagine most of us won't read much of it.
Start:
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Disposition of Comments Report
Research Review Title: Diagnosis and Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Draft review available for public comment from September 23, 2014, to October 20, 2014.
Research review citation: Smith MEB, Nelson HD, Haney E, Pappas M, Daeges M, Wasson N, McDonagh M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 219. (Prepared by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00014-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 15-E001-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2014. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
Comments to Research Review
The Effective Health Care (EHC) Program encourages the public to participate in the development of its research projects. Each research review is posted to the EHC Program Web site in draft form for public comment for a 4-week period. Comments can be submitted via the EHC Program Web site, mail or email. At the conclusion of the public comment period, authors use the commentators’ submissions and comments to revise the draft comparative effectiveness research review.
Comments on draft reviews and the authors’ responses to the comments are posted for public viewing on the EHC Program Web site approximately 3 months after the final research review is published. Comments are not edited for spelling, grammar, or other content errors. Each comment is listed with the name and affiliation of the commentator, if this information is provided. Commentators are not required to provide their names or affiliations in order to submit suggestions or comments.
The tables below include the responses by the authors of the review to each comment that was submitted for this draft review. The responses to comments in this disposition report are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Jennie Spotila just highlighted this on her blog: http://www.occupycfs.com/2015/05/29/running-in-the-background/
I don't recall seeing it before but I don't read all the threads on Phoenix Rising
It's a long document:
http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/586/2064/chronic-fatigue-disposition-150416.pdf
Some times it can be interesting to read about particular experts' views. For example, I found it interesting to read all sorts of weird and wonderful views Peter White had in the comments on the draft NICE guidelines (read here: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/inde...ice-guidelines-insight-into-their-views.1239/) and see that he has comments in the AHRQ document. If anyone sees anything of potential interest, perhaps you could post them as I imagine most of us won't read much of it.
Last edited: