I read that more thoroughly than I needed to.
It could have been written by Esther Crawley, and reads like an appeal for more money to be given to those who have treated CFS so badly.
At the moment, we don't need to spend more money on the 'care' that they are offering, we need to ensure that less money is given to those who are willing to mislead and manipulate patients.
It completely failed to go in to specifics about what A for ME thought this 'care' that needed funding was, and what sort of value for money it provided. I don't think it's ignorance which leads PCTs to distrust Crawley's claim that PACE showed a 30-40% recovery rate for CFS - anyone interested in looking at the evidence can see that she was lying.
PS: Thanks for posting it though Jenny.