@Tom Kindlon, Is this the peer reviewed publication of the pace trial? Or is there another one? Thx all for your hard work!
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
Thanks. This is a peer-reviewed paper.@Tom Kindlon, Is this the peer reviewed publication of the pace trial? Or is there another one? Thx all for your hard work!
Full text at http://www.tandfonline.com.sci-hub.cc/doi/abs/10.1080/21641846.2017.1259724
Can't seem to get the full text at that link. Getting some strange Cyrillic alphabet things coming up on the page
@JoanDublin - It should start a download of the pdf. It's sci-hub, which is a Russian site.Can't seem to get the full text at that link. Getting some strange Cyrillic alphabet things coming up on the page
Thank you so much, @Simon and others!
Is "Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior" connected to PubMed now? Will article be visible there?
Ellen Gouldsmit is whinging about the paper on the ME Associations Facebook page share of the article, if anybody is remotely interested in what she has to say. I point this out just in case she is actually raising valid points but unfortunately she just comes across as highly irritating to me.
Ellen Gouldsmit is whinging about the paper on the ME Associations Facebook page share of the article, if anybody is remotely interested in what she has to say. I point this out just in case she is actually raising valid points but unfortunately she just comes across as highly irritating to me.
Thanks @deleder2k , I couldn't seem to figure it out. Weirdly she was the one to share it with the ME Association in the first place, can't see the point in doing that and then being so critical about it.
You have to put the stage in place before you get on it
On FB post there is a claim that the authors don't really understand GET... immaterial to the argument of the paper, which is that 'recovery' is not actual recovery. The paper's thrust was not an attempt to explain GET in context.
She judges the quality of a paper with one only criterium: "has it been done by me?"
Doesn't appear to be doing that for me. Maybe it's my ipad. Will have a go on the PC later. Thanks@JoanDublin - It should start a download of the pdf. It's sci-hub, which is a Russian site.
She judges the quality of a paper with one only criterion: "has it been done by me?" Then this is good work. If not, it can only be the result of these unknowledgeable patients who understand nothing.
With friends like her, no need to have ennemies...