Jesse2233
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,942
- Location
- Southern California
Dr Byron Hyde of Ottawa and Jodi Basset of HFME both believe in a very narrowly defined definition of ME I'll refer to as Ramsay-ME (named after Melvin Ramsay).
In a nutshell Ramsay-ME is seen as distinct from CFS, in that it always involves:
For the purposes of discussion, let's address Ramsay-ME as a potentially distinct disease. If this is true, then what treatments / cures are possible?
---------------------------
Note: The purpose of this thread is not re-litigate the validity of Dr Hyde's definition as that's been done on other threads. Many (if not most) ME/CFS patients and doctors disagree with Dr Hyde's strict criteria. Ultimately he may be wrong and researchers like Dr Naviaux and Prof Lloyd may be right in that there are many paths to the same disease.
---------------------------
Some of my thoughts:
For Dr Hyde, Ramsay-ME seems to be brain damage from an enterovirus, full stop. That brain damage then creates all of the multisystemic downstream derangements.
This model seems akin to post-encephalacy as seen in the aftermath of severe meningitis but with different loci in the brain. Another conceptual model might be post-polio syndrome (again with different loci).
It's unclear if Dr Hyde feels a chronic virus, autoimmunity, and/or auto-inflammatory states are ongoing factors. For the purposes of discussion let's assume they're not (and that some of the non-responders to antivirals/antibiotics, immunomodulators, and immunosuppressants in fact have Ramsay-ME).
Again assuming it's brain damage, then what can be done theoretically or practically to encourage neurogenesis?
Some treatments that come to mind:
In a nutshell Ramsay-ME is seen as distinct from CFS, in that it always involves:
- Sudden onset following an acute flu-like illness
- An enterovirus recovered from stomach tissue
- A diffuse brain injury of a certain type (as seen on a SPECT / PET / qEEG)
For the purposes of discussion, let's address Ramsay-ME as a potentially distinct disease. If this is true, then what treatments / cures are possible?
---------------------------
Note: The purpose of this thread is not re-litigate the validity of Dr Hyde's definition as that's been done on other threads. Many (if not most) ME/CFS patients and doctors disagree with Dr Hyde's strict criteria. Ultimately he may be wrong and researchers like Dr Naviaux and Prof Lloyd may be right in that there are many paths to the same disease.
---------------------------
Some of my thoughts:
For Dr Hyde, Ramsay-ME seems to be brain damage from an enterovirus, full stop. That brain damage then creates all of the multisystemic downstream derangements.
This model seems akin to post-encephalacy as seen in the aftermath of severe meningitis but with different loci in the brain. Another conceptual model might be post-polio syndrome (again with different loci).
It's unclear if Dr Hyde feels a chronic virus, autoimmunity, and/or auto-inflammatory states are ongoing factors. For the purposes of discussion let's assume they're not (and that some of the non-responders to antivirals/antibiotics, immunomodulators, and immunosuppressants in fact have Ramsay-ME).
Again assuming it's brain damage, then what can be done theoretically or practically to encourage neurogenesis?
Some treatments that come to mind:
- HBOT
- Neurofeedback therapy
- Ketamine
- Aggressive rest therapy
- Neuronal stem cell therapy (theoretical)
- Cybernetic neuronal replacement (theoretical)
- Nanobotic repair (theoretical)