http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26403109
V Valentijn Senior Member Messages 15,786 What a mess. They abbreviate Lyme Disease as "LD", then only use LA after that. Presumably they mean it to be Lyme Arthritis, but it looks like no one has proof-read it, much less reviewed the article.
What a mess. They abbreviate Lyme Disease as "LD", then only use LA after that. Presumably they mean it to be Lyme Arthritis, but it looks like no one has proof-read it, much less reviewed the article.
M msf Senior Member Messages 3,650 It would have been good if they had included a non-Lyme arthritis group, which is why I said ´potential´ and added a question mark.
It would have been good if they had included a non-Lyme arthritis group, which is why I said ´potential´ and added a question mark.
B barbc56 Senior Member Messages 3,657 I was confused, as well about the switching of abbreviations. It would be great if there was a definitive biomarker. My question would be if you would find this same marker before lyme induced arthritis set in. So maybe a third control group of those with lyme at different stages? Barb
I was confused, as well about the switching of abbreviations. It would be great if there was a definitive biomarker. My question would be if you would find this same marker before lyme induced arthritis set in. So maybe a third control group of those with lyme at different stages? Barb
