I've been collecting some interesting bits of health and science news again, and rather than create loads of new threads I thought I'd stick them all in one...if anybody thinks one of these deserves its own thread, just go ahead...
Narcolepsy in Children after Swine Flu Vaccine - in 12 countries
Biggest news of the lot IMO: It's no longer wild and unscientific speculation to suggest that vaccines cause neurological disorders: GSK's Pandermix was caught in the act this time, as Scandinavians experienced a wave of narcolepsy cases. A genetic link has been suggested - which could be interesting if that relates to endogenous retroviruses in the same ancestry that's already linked to MS - but is it just Scandinavians that are affected? WHO says that 12 countries have now reported cases - but it won't say which ones, because only Finland, Sweden and Iceland have formally notified it (!).
I just think this is massive. Vaccine triggers new form of a neurological condition, previously unknown to medical science. That's no longer 'impossible' because it just happened...so where does that leave all the arguments usually raised against such hypotheses in the past? I've heard it said so many times that it's unscientific nonsense to suggest that vaccines can cause chronic illness: the debate and the science couldn't even start because it was said to be a nonsense idea. Surely this development changes everything?
It might also be interesting to look back through Google News and examine who was playing this down a few weeks ago...
Probably deserves its own thread here if it doesn't have one already.
http://healthland.time.com/2011/02/10/the-link-between-an-h1n1-vaccine-and-narcolepsy/
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9L8L9700.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20031347-10391695.html
Diabetes and virus link confirmed
Australian research finds that children with Type 1 diabetes are nearly 10 times as likely to also have a viral infection than healthy children. Enteroviruses in particular are implicated, and Type 1 diabetes cases are rising across the globe.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12354032
Scientists produce postcode map of geographical link to allergies
Map of allergies in Devon and Cornwall reveals "environmental clusters" of allergies.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/feb/07/allergies-scientists-research-geography
Air Pollution Can Trigger Heart Attacks
Air pollution triggers around the same amount of heart attacks as individual risk factors such as physical exertion, alcohol, and coffee, according to a new study:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/217190.php
Dust mites 'swarm' around houses
...migrating as a group in search of moisture...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_9290000/9290068.stm
Hope for millions as brain study unlocks secrets of Alzheimer's
Pioneering study of the chemical and genetic makeup of the vital microscopic gaps between nerve cells that control all brain functions. Scientists announced yesterday [Dec 20! Old news!] that they have identified more than a thousand proteins and their related genes which are involved in transmitting electrical messages from one nerve cell to another across the tiny gaps of the brain's many billions of synapses – switches that control brain activity. The researchers said the feat could be compared to the deciphering of the human genome.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...dy-unlocks-secrets-of-alzheimers-2164844.html
Funding for dementia research is dangerously low
"Startlingly low levels of funding for dementia research. How can a condition that strikes such fear into the public, affects nearly a million of us, and carries a 23 billion cost to our economy every year, remain the Cinderella disease in terms of research funding?"
Just 50m a year in research - while agreeing that's shockingly low, and disproportionately low compared to cancer and heart disease, what adjectives then are appropriate to describe the levels of funding for research into a condition that affects at least 250,000 of us, strikes early in life, and enjoyed just 109,000 of government funding last financial year?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/8314354/Funding-for-dementia-research-is-dangerously-low.html
Unlicensed herbal medicines to escape EU ban
Angry reaction from some scientists to the decision by the UK government to allow some chinese and herbal medicines to escape the EU ban. This seems to be a small but significant concession: such medicines can still be accessed but only through licensed practitioners - not over-the-counter in health food shops - which drives the price way up of course and removes the ability for people to manage their own health in this way.
These new measures aren't far away now, and are set to have massive implications for people who are currently using herbal remedies.
To my mind, it's a disgustingly arrogant crackdown and in practice an appallingly cruel measure. Even as big pharma continues to establish scientifically the mechanisms by which these forms of medicine do work - and re-packages them for sale - it shuts down the access to forms of healing that people have used for centuries purely because nobody has scientifically proven them yet. The cruellest part being that in many cases the medical world has no answer to people's problems and is offering nothing in return: it's shutting down access to naturally growing medicines that help many people with their pain because it can't make profit out of them itself. It wants a complete monopoly on healthcare and it doesn't care who has to suffer to get it. Time to start stockpiling those essential remedies that you know work well for you...
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/855767-chinese-medicine-and-herbal-ban-to-see-britain-defy-eu-laws
http://www.webmd.boots.com/vitamins.../unlicensed-herbal-medicines-to-escape-eu-ban
Unpublished results hide the decline effect
Quite a discussion emerging about the worrying possibility of 'the decline effect': the strange phenomenon whereby scientific findings that were thought sound seem to be gradually diminishing in effect: repeat old experiments, and the effect seems to be getting less powerful. This has even happened in some physics results so it's becoming quite a theme...and one of the issues arising as a potential explanation is publication bias: an issue quite relevant to us in relation to XMRV. This article from Nature is an interesting discussion, and the proposal for dealing with data is very similar to ideas I've argued for here previously. The debate begins to get to the heart of the question as to how scientific our current scientific process really is.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110223/full/470437a.html
Narcolepsy in Children after Swine Flu Vaccine - in 12 countries
Biggest news of the lot IMO: It's no longer wild and unscientific speculation to suggest that vaccines cause neurological disorders: GSK's Pandermix was caught in the act this time, as Scandinavians experienced a wave of narcolepsy cases. A genetic link has been suggested - which could be interesting if that relates to endogenous retroviruses in the same ancestry that's already linked to MS - but is it just Scandinavians that are affected? WHO says that 12 countries have now reported cases - but it won't say which ones, because only Finland, Sweden and Iceland have formally notified it (!).
I just think this is massive. Vaccine triggers new form of a neurological condition, previously unknown to medical science. That's no longer 'impossible' because it just happened...so where does that leave all the arguments usually raised against such hypotheses in the past? I've heard it said so many times that it's unscientific nonsense to suggest that vaccines can cause chronic illness: the debate and the science couldn't even start because it was said to be a nonsense idea. Surely this development changes everything?
It might also be interesting to look back through Google News and examine who was playing this down a few weeks ago...
Probably deserves its own thread here if it doesn't have one already.
http://healthland.time.com/2011/02/10/the-link-between-an-h1n1-vaccine-and-narcolepsy/
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9L8L9700.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20031347-10391695.html
Diabetes and virus link confirmed
Australian research finds that children with Type 1 diabetes are nearly 10 times as likely to also have a viral infection than healthy children. Enteroviruses in particular are implicated, and Type 1 diabetes cases are rising across the globe.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12354032
Scientists produce postcode map of geographical link to allergies
Map of allergies in Devon and Cornwall reveals "environmental clusters" of allergies.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/feb/07/allergies-scientists-research-geography
Air Pollution Can Trigger Heart Attacks
Air pollution triggers around the same amount of heart attacks as individual risk factors such as physical exertion, alcohol, and coffee, according to a new study:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/217190.php
Dust mites 'swarm' around houses
...migrating as a group in search of moisture...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_9290000/9290068.stm
Hope for millions as brain study unlocks secrets of Alzheimer's
Pioneering study of the chemical and genetic makeup of the vital microscopic gaps between nerve cells that control all brain functions. Scientists announced yesterday [Dec 20! Old news!] that they have identified more than a thousand proteins and their related genes which are involved in transmitting electrical messages from one nerve cell to another across the tiny gaps of the brain's many billions of synapses – switches that control brain activity. The researchers said the feat could be compared to the deciphering of the human genome.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...dy-unlocks-secrets-of-alzheimers-2164844.html
Funding for dementia research is dangerously low
"Startlingly low levels of funding for dementia research. How can a condition that strikes such fear into the public, affects nearly a million of us, and carries a 23 billion cost to our economy every year, remain the Cinderella disease in terms of research funding?"
Just 50m a year in research - while agreeing that's shockingly low, and disproportionately low compared to cancer and heart disease, what adjectives then are appropriate to describe the levels of funding for research into a condition that affects at least 250,000 of us, strikes early in life, and enjoyed just 109,000 of government funding last financial year?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/8314354/Funding-for-dementia-research-is-dangerously-low.html
Unlicensed herbal medicines to escape EU ban
Angry reaction from some scientists to the decision by the UK government to allow some chinese and herbal medicines to escape the EU ban. This seems to be a small but significant concession: such medicines can still be accessed but only through licensed practitioners - not over-the-counter in health food shops - which drives the price way up of course and removes the ability for people to manage their own health in this way.
These new measures aren't far away now, and are set to have massive implications for people who are currently using herbal remedies.
To my mind, it's a disgustingly arrogant crackdown and in practice an appallingly cruel measure. Even as big pharma continues to establish scientifically the mechanisms by which these forms of medicine do work - and re-packages them for sale - it shuts down the access to forms of healing that people have used for centuries purely because nobody has scientifically proven them yet. The cruellest part being that in many cases the medical world has no answer to people's problems and is offering nothing in return: it's shutting down access to naturally growing medicines that help many people with their pain because it can't make profit out of them itself. It wants a complete monopoly on healthcare and it doesn't care who has to suffer to get it. Time to start stockpiling those essential remedies that you know work well for you...
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/855767-chinese-medicine-and-herbal-ban-to-see-britain-defy-eu-laws
http://www.webmd.boots.com/vitamins.../unlicensed-herbal-medicines-to-escape-eu-ban
Unpublished results hide the decline effect
Quite a discussion emerging about the worrying possibility of 'the decline effect': the strange phenomenon whereby scientific findings that were thought sound seem to be gradually diminishing in effect: repeat old experiments, and the effect seems to be getting less powerful. This has even happened in some physics results so it's becoming quite a theme...and one of the issues arising as a potential explanation is publication bias: an issue quite relevant to us in relation to XMRV. This article from Nature is an interesting discussion, and the proposal for dealing with data is very similar to ideas I've argued for here previously. The debate begins to get to the heart of the question as to how scientific our current scientific process really is.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110223/full/470437a.html