I think that most patients who deteriorate after rituximab do so because they spend much energy on preparing, getting to hospital, staying in the hospital for 5-6 hours the first infusion, travelling home and so on. Someone also gets side effects from the glucocorticoids given prior to the rituximab infusion. Even though we don't know yet, there seems to be some patients that react to the drug itself. We don't know why, but the side effects doesn't seem extremely significant for the majority of patients. If one is bedridden I wouldn't gamble with rituximab, but if you're able to fly to Norway and walk around without getting much worse, I would consider it if I had the $ to do so. One could also argue that we'll know the answers to the phase 3 trial in just one short year, and that the best thing would be to wait.
It seems to me that it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of Ampligen to Rituximab. I have not heard of patients recovering compeltely after getting Ampligen. The fact that they give two Ampligen infusions a week seems like something that would have a significantly bad effect on many patients. And how we figured out what the cost is? If the price is 5 times rituximab treatment for a year, is it worth it?
Another question is if someone actually will give you Ampligen. You could send an e-mail or call Kolibri Medical and ask them about it. Tell them about the studies and that it is available through the Early Access Programme. I think one of the reasoning behind Kolibri treating patients with rituximab is that the doctor has used the drug for many years, and knows how to handle it. I have no clue whether he would be willing to prescribe Ampligen.