The other main criticism I would make of the piece - which of course I think is overall positive and will reach a HUGE audience - is that his ignorance of the substance of the PACE trial means he doesn't know that the CBT they were studying was the "evil CBT" (I think this is justinreilly's phrase and it seems to me like a good shorthand) - the kind where they tell you it IS all in your head, you need to overcome your fear of movement, etc.
As I keep saying, not everything that comes in a box labeled "therapy" is the same, or is equally beneficial. (Heck, I don't think there are a lot of people around who know the difference between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and other forms of therapy, such as the psychodynamic approach. Psychodynamic therapy is the kind that I get. But that's a separate issue.) This writer seems to be referring, NOT to the evil CBT used in the PACE trial, but the even-more-bogus evil "pacing" used in the trial. If you'll recall, that specially cooked-up version of pacing involved telling the patient they would NEVER get better and they just had to stay within their envelope for life - and that this extremely structured version of pacing, driven entirely by inflexible daily routines and not by the state of the patient's own body on a given day, was pretty much the opposite of the kind of "pacing" that many patients do to their benefit. The PACE trial sponsors deliberately invented an evil version of pacing in order to discredit the advocacy of "pacing" by patient groups. Part of the evil was including in the "pacing" therapy TELLING THE PATIENTS THEY WOULD NEVER IMPROVE.
I have serious, serious questions about the ethics of a lot of this. My personal view is that a very delicate balance needs to be attained between realizing and accepting the limitations that we have on our lives *right now* and for the immediately foreseeable future, and learning to work within those limitations - and NOT giving up hope that things will get better in the future, that we might have better treatments or even a cure available sometime - soon? within our lifetimes? I don't think a therapist coming in and saying either "You're not really sick" OR "You're really sick and you're never going to get better" is beneficial - or ethical. Those are both really bad solutions and neither represents the best of what psychotherapy has to offer for us.