This is the REAL STORY! Enjoy !
http://news.sciencemag.org/health/2015/10/criticism-mounts-long-controversial-chronic-fatigue-study
Agreed! This is good!
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
This is the REAL STORY! Enjoy !
http://news.sciencemag.org/health/2015/10/criticism-mounts-long-controversial-chronic-fatigue-study
Do they truly not understand or are they plain evil?!
Tuller asked many of them to comment last year I think, and again more recently. They would have known he was about to publish.It is however possible that DT knew that this Lancet paper was about to be published
There is definitely a portion of evil in there somewhere. I was thinking all last week that the forces of good and evil were gathering for a final confrontation - must have been all that star wars hype.Do they truly not understand or are they plain evil?!
My family in England, which includes therapists and alternative health practitioners, are going to wake up to that article on their breakfast table this morning.
Its almost like they want to say: see, we could not be proved wrong, na na nanana.Null results yet loads of spin. Sigh.
Double posting in two threads, but thought this might be a bit of welcome good news in the midst of our media drubbing:
https://twitter.com/coyneoftherealm/status/659176151458390016
James Coyne is on the case!
What I don't get is why it was so malicious when the Telegraph have a good track record on ME. The headline, whatever the nuance, was clearly meant to read "not sick" to the casual observer. Frederick Barclay apparently has CFS. It strikes me that his paper isn't doing him any favours.postscript to my postscript .... the more I think about it, the more certain I am that the Telegraph knew exactly how contentious this was and put it top of the front page, with such a provocatively unequivocal headline, for exactly that reason.
Click bait, published in the full knowledge that what they were publishing was highly debatable and probably bullshit. And by protesting, we just drive more traffic to them.
Aren't they clever? Aren't they despicable?
I know. I've tried to have a charitable explanation for a lot of stuff that's gone down and don't like conspiracy theories. But this is frankly jaw dropping.Ethically this is indefensible.
Honestly, WB, I think it's just "This'll stir things up!" It's as cynical as that. Make waves, provoke argument, get talked about. The bottom line is the bottom line.What I don't get is why it was so malicious when the Telegraph have a good track record on ME. The headline, whatever the nuance, was clearly meant to read "not sick" to the casual observer. Frederick Barclay apparently has CFS. It strikes me that his paper isn't doing him any favours.
Click bait, published in the full knowledge that what they were publishing was highly debatable and probably bullshit. And by protesting, we just drive more traffic to them.