Choline on the Brain? A Guide to Choline in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Scientists falsify data to get research published and whistleblowers are bullied into

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Yogi, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. Yogi

    Yogi Senior Member

    PACE Trial is the best example of this!

    'Scientists falsify data to get research published and whistleblowers are bullied into keeping quiet,' claim their own colleagues
    UPDATED: 17:00, 12 January 2012
    Comments (22)

    More than one in ten scientists and doctors claim to have witnessed colleagues deliberately fabricating data in order to get their research published, a new poll has revealed.
    The survey of almost 2,800 experts in Britain also found six per cent knew of possible research misconduct at their own institution that has not been properly investigated.
    The poll for the hugely-respected British Medical Journal (BMJ) is being presented at a meeting aimed at tackling research misconduct in the UK.

    Dangerous: A poll for the BMJ suggests 13 per cent of doctors and scientists know of colleagues who have falsified data to get their research published
    It is being hosted by the BMJ and the Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope).
    Dr Fiona Godlee, BMJ editor in chief, said: 'While our survey can't provide a true estimate of how much research misconduct there is in the UK, it does show that there is a substantial number of cases and that UK institutions are failing to investigate adequately, if at all.
    'The BMJ has been told of junior academics being advised to keep concerns to themselves to protect their careers, being bullied into not publishing their findings, or having their contracts terminated when they spoke out.'
    'Scientists and doctors who deliberately hide results have breached their ethical duty to trial participants'
    BMJ's clinical epidemiology editor Dr Elizabeth Lode
    Cope chair Dr Elizabeth Wager added: 'This survey chimes with our experience where we see many cases of institutions not co-operating with journals and failing to investigate research misconduct properly.'
    Earlier this month, health experts writing in the BMJ online warned that excluding data from clinical trials could endanger patients.
    In an editorial, Dr Richard Lehman from Oxford University and the journals clinical epidemiology editor Dr Elizabeth Loder called for an end to the 'culture of haphazard publication and incomplete data disclosure'.
    They called for more robust regulation and full access to the raw trial data, not just what ends up being published.
    They said that those who deliberately hide results 'have breached their ethical duty to trial participants'

    Read more:
    Firestormm, Enid and taniaaust1 like this.
  2. taniaaust1

    taniaaust1 Senior Member

    Sth Australia
    thanks for posting that. yeah PACE trial comes to mind.
  3. Enid

    Enid Senior Member

    Thanks for posting Yogi - the whole "culture" as we know = the history of ME here bringing medical journalism in too (by fair means or foul) to silence opposition.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page