Murph
:)
- Messages
- 1,799
J Transl Med. 2018 Nov 21;16(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1696-z.
Evaluation of four clinical laboratory parameters for the diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis.
De Meirleir KL1, Mijatovic T2, Subramanian K3, Schlauch KA4, Lombardi VC5.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is a complex and debilitating disease that often initially presents with flu-like symptoms, accompanied by incapacitating fatigue. Currently, there are no objective biomarkers or laboratory tests that can be used to unequivocally diagnosis ME; therefore, a diagnosis is made when a patient meets series of a costly and subjective inclusion and exclusion criteria. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility of four clinical parameters in diagnosing ME.
METHODS:
In the present study, we utilized logistic regression and classification and regression tree analysis to conduct a retrospective investigation of four clinical laboratory in 140 ME cases and 140 healthy controls.
RESULTS:
Correlations between the covariates ranged between [- 0.26, 0.61]. The best model included the serum levels of the soluble form of CD14 (sCD14), serum levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and serum levels of interleukin 8, with coefficients 0.002, 0.249, and 0.005, respectively, and p-values of 3 × 10-7, 1 × 10-5, and 3 × 10-3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings show that these parameters may help physicians in their diagnosis of ME and may additionally shed light on the pathophysiology of this disease.
KEYWORDS:
Chronic fatigue; Diagnostic; IL-8, PGE2; ME/CFS; sCD14, CD57
PMID:
30463572
DOI:
10.1186/s12967-018-1696-z
Evaluation of four clinical laboratory parameters for the diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis.
De Meirleir KL1, Mijatovic T2, Subramanian K3, Schlauch KA4, Lombardi VC5.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is a complex and debilitating disease that often initially presents with flu-like symptoms, accompanied by incapacitating fatigue. Currently, there are no objective biomarkers or laboratory tests that can be used to unequivocally diagnosis ME; therefore, a diagnosis is made when a patient meets series of a costly and subjective inclusion and exclusion criteria. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility of four clinical parameters in diagnosing ME.
METHODS:
In the present study, we utilized logistic regression and classification and regression tree analysis to conduct a retrospective investigation of four clinical laboratory in 140 ME cases and 140 healthy controls.
RESULTS:
Correlations between the covariates ranged between [- 0.26, 0.61]. The best model included the serum levels of the soluble form of CD14 (sCD14), serum levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and serum levels of interleukin 8, with coefficients 0.002, 0.249, and 0.005, respectively, and p-values of 3 × 10-7, 1 × 10-5, and 3 × 10-3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings show that these parameters may help physicians in their diagnosis of ME and may additionally shed light on the pathophysiology of this disease.
KEYWORDS:
Chronic fatigue; Diagnostic; IL-8, PGE2; ME/CFS; sCD14, CD57
PMID:
30463572
DOI:
10.1186/s12967-018-1696-z