Funny, the only conspiracy theorist I know is European. To say nothing of the conspiracy theories running rampant through the Middle East and Arab communities in Europe.
Maybe you hear more about US conspiracy theorists because the US is a very large country with a large, free, and vocal population. It may be a question of absolute numbers rather than percentages.
It's wise not to throw around stereotypes and generalizations. They are rarely meaningful or truthful, and often offensive. And it makes you look like a weak-minded bigot with poor critical thinking skills.
That was a neutral view from the outside. I wrote that I have the impression that the US has an above average number of conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists. That is a subjective personal opinion.
That does not mean that there aren't conspiracy theorists outside the US nor that the US has more than anyone else. Also it does not mean that US citiziens are bad, paranoid whatever. Why do you consider this to be offensive?
And yes I do have heard a lot of this stuff coming form the middle east as well.
Why do I believe this:
Almost all theories that i heard of center around some US stuff. I don't know of any local conspiracy theories where I live our from countries close to me(EU). You don't hear anything about this. That doesn't mean that there aren't any. Just that they seem to be more common in US based discussions.
Personally I don't think of this either good or bad. It is just something that i noticed.
To a certain extent i can understand that citiziens in the US would trust their government less than in many other parts of the world. Just think about the mass surveillance scandal or iraq invasion. Scary stuff.
SOC said:
It's wise not to throw around stereotypes and generalizations
A generalization would have been if i had written all americans are conspiracy theorists.
They are rarely meaningful or truthful, and often offensive. And it makes you look like a weak-minded bigot with poor critical thinking skills.
Often offensive?
Which justifies referring to others as 'weak-minded bigots with poor critical thinking skills' just because someone had made a neutral observation that wasn't even intended as a criticism?