Lack of research in no way proves the efficacy of a substance
I didn't mean to imply that it does. The point I was making is that the authors go too far, for instance they say that:
Not a single company behind 15 detox supplements could supply any form of evidence for their efficacy (or safety).
Weak though my above link is, I think that animal studies qualify as "any form of evidence"--and there are a few animal studies on the actions of dandelion root.
And what about the assertion that "Worse still, the companies couldn’t even name the toxins targeted by their products or simply agree on a definition for the word 'detox'"? If we look into the potential medicinal qualities of dandelion root, we find that it increases bile excretion in animal models. Excretion in bile is how many drugs leave the body. Is there evidence that increasing bile flow increases excretion of these metabolites in healthy people? I don't know. But again, the authors aren't making this point, they choose instead to accuse these companies of not having any idea what their product even theoretically is helping to excrete.
So can we find something toxic that an increase in bile secretion would theoretically help remove from the body? Yes--copper. As
medscape reports: "The control of copper balance is determined by biliary copper excretion where the amount of copper appearing in the bile is directly proportional to the size of the hepatic copper pool."
As I said before, there are a lot of dodgy products out there. But I am cautious reading anything where the authors display obvious confirmation bias--and the report you linked to is a prime example. Had they made the case that inexpensive grocery store "detox" products use a very loose definition of detox which often encompasses antioxidants and contain ingredients whose efficacy ranges from "once-removed" to "unproven" to "highly questionable," I would agree and generally think well of the report. If they suggested that more money should be directed towards the understanding of herbal medicine, I would love it. Instead they willfully mistake the inability of salespeople to immediately reference research articles as proof that no research, and indeed no thought process underlies any of the products. And they compound this by generalizing their "findings" to nearly all products that use "detox" in their name or marketing.