Woolie
Senior Member
- Messages
- 3,263
I think I remember reading that the chances of improvement are higher for people diagnosed in their teens than those diagnosed later?
I also don't like the implications of the article, and I don't like the way people use the MECFS label for things that are very different (e.g. depression). But I worry when we all question someone's diagnosis just because their symptoms are not as severe as ours, or they were lucky enough to improve/go into remission. None of this means they didn't have genuine MECFS. I think "genuine" MECFS varies in its severity, and also in its time course. Just the fact someone improved (especially someone young) doesn't make it "not MECFS". It just makes them luckier than us!
Of course, such people might turn out to have a different disease mechanism from those with the more severe progressive forms - there might be quite a few different pathways that lead to the syndrome - but until we fully understand the basis of the heterogeneity in MECFS, we can't say more.
I also don't like the implications of the article, and I don't like the way people use the MECFS label for things that are very different (e.g. depression). But I worry when we all question someone's diagnosis just because their symptoms are not as severe as ours, or they were lucky enough to improve/go into remission. None of this means they didn't have genuine MECFS. I think "genuine" MECFS varies in its severity, and also in its time course. Just the fact someone improved (especially someone young) doesn't make it "not MECFS". It just makes them luckier than us!
Of course, such people might turn out to have a different disease mechanism from those with the more severe progressive forms - there might be quite a few different pathways that lead to the syndrome - but until we fully understand the basis of the heterogeneity in MECFS, we can't say more.