alex3619
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,810
- Location
- Logan, Queensland, Australia
EBM and psychiatry are an oxymoron. How do you get evidence based guidelines when you have no idea what is really wrong with people? Psychiatry is all about theoretical categories. Very sick people are pigeonholed. There are no diagnostic tests. So there can be zero gold standard studies. As in none, zilch, nada.Maybe this is why doctors have been so willing to let BPS theories go unchallenged: anything involving the psyche seems to make even EBM devotees go a bit flakey.
Psychiatry has long had a pass on good science. They have alternative scientific standards for the most part. There is some work toward changing this, including at the NIMH which is trying to develop an alternative diagnostic process, but not nearly enough. Psychiatry typically gets a free pass on good scientific methodology. The reason, I suspect, is most claims will utterly fail if forced to use sound scientific and evidentiary processes.
Now there are some psychiatric disorders, or former psychiatric disorders, for which this is changing, including at least schizophrenia and Alzeimers, plus probably a few other types of dementia. We also know psychiatric symptoms can be induced by pathogens and metabolic, genetic and nutritional issues. So science can be done here. It just often isn't.
So instead we get woo therapies, not properly tested, and possibly bogus in many cases.
Psychiatry faces similar issues that CFS and even ME diagnoses do. If doctors are sceptical about ME or CFS then they should give the entire DSM a miss, because all of it in clinical practice is based upon interpretations of symptoms. At least ME has consistent and extreme pathophysiology, though some psychiatric diagnoses do too, like some subgroups in depression.