SOC
Senior Member
- Messages
- 7,849
I never said, "Oh that is better". I said that it has a higher bioavailability and is considered slightly safer. Those are the facts.@SOC, I had a horrible reaction to Valtrex so to just say "Oh that is better" is not always so. And sometimes money is a huge issue so whether something is better or not is an individual decision based on many things.
I also had problems with Famvir and now I have problems with Acyclovir. If I had to choose which one I would take it would be the Famvir since it works better and you don't have as many kidney issues with it.
Of course, individuals have different responses to different meds. What gives me no trouble may give you side effects, and vice versa. I never said Valtrex is always better for all patients. No one can know that. I gave Katyw some known facts about the medications which she can use to discuss with her doctor and make her own decision.
Indeed, money can be a huge issue. That said, a lower dose of a more effective but more expensive medicine can cost less than a higher dose of a less effective medicine. It depends on dosage and cost. It's worth looking into rather than dismissing out of hand without getting the facts.
Famvir has also been effective in some cases. It, too, is worth looking into. I only mentioned Valtrex because it is the same drug (once it's in the system) as acyclovir. I wasn't trying to suggest a different drug, just that she look into the more bioavailable form of the same drug.
Not everyone has kidney issues with Valtrex. It is a possibility, of course.