Davsey27
Senior Member
- Messages
- 515
It seems that there are various cause(s) and maintaining factors that differ from individual to individual after observing other patients in support groups
Looking at remission,it seems that individuals revover in different ways which makes sense given one's indivisualbiochemistry I don't think there will be a singular cure the way institutions like Stanford are looking
I don't think there is harm in trying to look into more clues or pathways and of course I cannot see the future
Yet I find it improbable that the remission rate will change much over the next decade.Perhaps closer to 10% but in my opinion I don't see it really going much higher.I hope I'm mistaken
Perhaps the % of individuals who improve[I think a good chunk of these may be those who have more access to $ and functional medicine] may go up but as far as cures/remissions while I believe researchers are looking for a cure its gonna be tough and very likely improbable.
I think there's value in functional medicine.I still think though that it's not as simple as x lab shows x number of abnormalities you fix the problem and the symptoms are gone.It
It seems that ME is much more complex than this
[Though some may get lucky taking more chances while others may get financially drained]
I honestly don't believe there will be much change and I believe that finding the right doctor,or taking a macheveliian approach may improve one's odds.Some may get lucky
Any progress,though incremental I think is a step in the positive direction even if it's a 1-5% increase in remission over the next 10-20 years as it probabilistically may increase the odds of improvement for a certain % of individuals
Yet I believe it shouldn't stop patients from researching and trying to find ways in improving or finding a cure at an individual level.
Part of this seems to be luck and I wouldn't get my hopes up very high
Looking at remission,it seems that individuals revover in different ways which makes sense given one's indivisualbiochemistry I don't think there will be a singular cure the way institutions like Stanford are looking
I don't think there is harm in trying to look into more clues or pathways and of course I cannot see the future
Yet I find it improbable that the remission rate will change much over the next decade.Perhaps closer to 10% but in my opinion I don't see it really going much higher.I hope I'm mistaken
Perhaps the % of individuals who improve[I think a good chunk of these may be those who have more access to $ and functional medicine] may go up but as far as cures/remissions while I believe researchers are looking for a cure its gonna be tough and very likely improbable.
I think there's value in functional medicine.I still think though that it's not as simple as x lab shows x number of abnormalities you fix the problem and the symptoms are gone.It
It seems that ME is much more complex than this
[Though some may get lucky taking more chances while others may get financially drained]
I honestly don't believe there will be much change and I believe that finding the right doctor,or taking a macheveliian approach may improve one's odds.Some may get lucky
Any progress,though incremental I think is a step in the positive direction even if it's a 1-5% increase in remission over the next 10-20 years as it probabilistically may increase the odds of improvement for a certain % of individuals
Yet I believe it shouldn't stop patients from researching and trying to find ways in improving or finding a cure at an individual level.
Part of this seems to be luck and I wouldn't get my hopes up very high
Last edited: