RogerBlack
Senior Member
- Messages
- 902
. So they have been told how much money they are potentially getting, and within that limit, they are saying what they would fund and what they wouldn't, and why.
As an example, this is an increase...
I think it's an uncontraversial statement to say that Trump would care lots more about spending money on federal research into reducing gun violence than CFS. (in that he would be far more opposed).
I don't think the thread title is meaningful - especially with the date on the critical document turning out to be October.
From memory, and basing this off NASA, '2017 budget' would be something worked out in 2016, and indeed about October (before Trump), which would have been confirmed some time ago (with whatever alterations).
We need to find whatever the final decision was on this - this is a proposed budget, it may not have passed in this form, but it probably actually is in force now - whatever the state, and we can't alter it by writing our (well, not my) representatives for this year.