Parismountain
Senior Member
- Messages
- 181
- Location
- South Carolina
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029914
I can't decide if I'm reading this correctly but my question is in experiment 2 did they prove that monkeys treated for 7 months on antibiotics, that they then let ticks feed on the monkeys and then tested the ticks for disease and found it? Is that admitting that if we're similar to monkeys in regards to Lymes disease that 7 months after treatment you can turn a tick into a carrier?
If that's true I don't see how science can claim there is no such thing as late stage lymes disease.
Anybody venture to explain this to me?
I can't decide if I'm reading this correctly but my question is in experiment 2 did they prove that monkeys treated for 7 months on antibiotics, that they then let ticks feed on the monkeys and then tested the ticks for disease and found it? Is that admitting that if we're similar to monkeys in regards to Lymes disease that 7 months after treatment you can turn a tick into a carrier?
If that's true I don't see how science can claim there is no such thing as late stage lymes disease.
Anybody venture to explain this to me?