AndyPR
Senior Member
- Messages
- 2,516
A couple of blog posts that I don't think have been linked on PR before.
https://peterkempblog.wordpress.com...t-the-criteria-is-as-useless-as-normal-range/
and
https://peterkempblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/12/pace-trial-improvers/
https://peterkempblog.wordpress.com...t-the-criteria-is-as-useless-as-normal-range/
Many more participants in all groups reached the threshold of ‘Improved’ for Physical Functioning (PF), than reached the threshold of ‘Improved’ for Fatigue. E.g., at 52 weeks in the CBT group 79 met the PF criteria, nearly double the number (42) that reached the Fatigue criteria. This is a problem.
and
https://peterkempblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/12/pace-trial-improvers/
Now that QMUL have provided a smidgen of data to work with, I am glad to provide readers with a chart illustrating the results of a £5 million waste of money. GET and CBT are not treatments.