JaimeS
Senior Member
- Messages
- 3,408
- Location
- Silicon Valley, CA
Then i was trying to explain his test was an nk numbers test and the university test was measuring the nk function and my nk cells dont work. He didnt get it.
We've been able to detect the function of NK cells for decades! It's not exactly a standard laboratory test, but it's not news.
But then, my GP didn't understand any of the tests I got back from Mayo. But to be fair, he wasn't trained in immunology like your guy supposedly was!
Why the hell do they have these tests if they arent important???
Good question.
I remember after the methacholine challenge, they said it proved I had a breathing issue of some sort. I said, "asthma?" they said, "....maybe." Then they told me it wasn't specific and it just proved there was something really wrong. At least the nurse had the humor to admit, "bet you could've told us that, eh?"
That reminds me of my absolute favorite: when you react a certain way to a medication or a test and they swear it's the first time in the history of ever that any such thing has ever happened. Then you go home and it's all in the literature and not even as a crazy-wild thing: "occasionally, the patient will..." Mine was, "occasionally the methacholine will test positive but inhaled albuterol will not restore function... this means that, likely..." Meanwhile the nurse was like this has never happened before in the history of diagnostic testing.
Actually, I wonder if they do that to avoid the specter of litigation: if you're the only one this has ever happened to in the history of the world, then it wasn't important to warn you and the tech cannot be expected to have known what to do under such a circumstance.