knackers323
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,625
That's true about Donald Scott, some of the papers are discussed in the Skull Valley Incident book and he does name names. The scientists involved in developing such pathogens often published papers on what they were doing while cleverly concealing the true intent of their research. This is what Lo did.
To quote Nicolson, 'After all, it could prove to be interesting, and he might be able to even publish some of the work if he was clever not to reveal the real agenda behind the 'Day Lily'. He will just have to keep the important points secret from his scientific colleagues. This was done all the time by military scientists, so it should not be a problem. He was rarely allowed to publish in China, and the thought of seeing his name in print thrilled him. Thoughts of how to hide the real agenda and truth about the 'Day Lily' mycoplasma while publishing on the more academic points of the microorganism enthralled him. He would control the academic chess game, because he will be the only one that knows all of the facts behind the little mycoplasma. Dr. Lo hesistated and then smiled at the two men. He was weak and would do exactly what they wanted, even though he considered them of inferior intelligence and incapable of important decisions that could affect the future of mankind. One does not have to be evil to do evil, because good men only have to say nothing and do nothing.'
Not all people with CFS test positive for mycoplasma. I think most papers stated that around 50% of their patients tested positive. I tested negative. Nicolson recommended RedLabs to me. The sample should be tested within 24hrs and preferably refrigerated not frozen.
Maybe Scott is right about his theory, but maybe that only applies to the sites where they 'field tested' the
pathogen(s).....the documented outbreaks possibly. CFS might also be caused by pathogens that have not been weaponised and we really dont know whether current cases of CFS are related to the past outbreaks.
It does appear though that there was an effort to distract scientists/doctors away from mycoplasma testing. For instance, Lo published a paper in 1993 with Komaroff, Bell and Cheney stating that antibodies against mycoplasmas could not be detected in CFS patients. Lo knows that antibody based assays are not a suitable method of detecting mycoplasmas and he stated this in his own patent. He is dishonest.
This article states that Dr. Nicolson ‘notes that once a laboratory gets a reliable test in place (for mycoplasmas) the laboratory is often shut down. There are only a few labs left that test for mycoplasma as a result.......Dr. Nicolson finds that laboratories that test for mycoplasma are highly scrutinised by federal agencies and that may affect the way the labs test and report this type of infection.’ http://www.immed.org/infectious disease reports/InfectDiseaseReport06.11.09update/PHA_Nicolson_0709_v4.07.pdf
That's true about Donald Scott, some of the papers are discussed in the Skull Valley Incident book and he does name names. The scientists involved in developing such pathogens often published papers on what they were doing while cleverly concealing the true intent of their research. This is what Lo did.
To quote Nicolson, 'After all, it could prove to be interesting, and he might be able to even publish some of the work if he was clever not to reveal the real agenda behind the 'Day Lily'. He will just have to keep the important points secret from his scientific colleagues. This was done all the time by military scientists, so it should not be a problem. He was rarely allowed to publish in China, and the thought of seeing his name in print thrilled him. Thoughts of how to hide the real agenda and truth about the 'Day Lily' mycoplasma while publishing on the more academic points of the microorganism enthralled him. He would control the academic chess game, because he will be the only one that knows all of the facts behind the little mycoplasma. Dr. Lo hesistated and then smiled at the two men. He was weak and would do exactly what they wanted, even though he considered them of inferior intelligence and incapable of important decisions that could affect the future of mankind. One does not have to be evil to do evil, because good men only have to say nothing and do nothing.'
Not all people with CFS test positive for mycoplasma. I think most papers stated that around 50% of their patients tested positive. I tested negative. Nicolson recommended RedLabs to me. The sample should be tested within 24hrs and preferably refrigerated not frozen.
Maybe Scott is right about his theory, but maybe that only applies to the sites where they 'field tested' the
pathogen(s).....the documented outbreaks possibly. CFS might also be caused by pathogens that have not been weaponised and we really dont know whether current cases of CFS are related to the past outbreaks.
It does appear though that there was an effort to distract scientists/doctors away from mycoplasma testing. For instance, Lo published a paper in 1993 with Komaroff, Bell and Cheney stating that antibodies against mycoplasmas could not be detected in CFS patients. Lo knows that antibody based assays are not a suitable method of detecting mycoplasmas and he stated this in his own patent. He is dishonest.
This article states that Dr. Nicolson ‘notes that once a laboratory gets a reliable test in place (for mycoplasmas) the laboratory is often shut down. There are only a few labs left that test for mycoplasma as a result.......Dr. Nicolson finds that laboratories that test for mycoplasma are highly scrutinised by federal agencies and that may affect the way the labs test and report this type of infection.’ http://www.immed.org/infectious disease reports/InfectDiseaseReport06.11.09update/PHA_Nicolson_0709_v4.07.pdf
There is a lab in sydney that tests for mycoplasma via pcr that I have twice tested strong positive with. Australian Biologics.
So if its true that this mycoplasma developed by Lo is a big player in many cases of cfs and he is now head of an organisation supposedly looking for the cause of cfs. He isn't actually looking for the answer at all but in fact, actively trying to keep it hidden.
Do I have this right?