No. It relates to the fact that you haven't given any alternatives despite plenty of opportunities. Instead telling us about the difficulties people have. Not solution-focused.
As I have said, some of the same points you have made appear to me to be relevant to any suggestions people might make as people are time/energy poor.
Telling me that I don't understand the level of poverty people are in is insulting in my eyes. I was gobsmacked as it wasn't a premise of my argument. My argument isn't that everyone are in a position to give.
Lots of people can take offense about what other people who don't agree with them say. I imagine this can go on all night.
But I don't think you do understand the level of poverty in the ME/CFS population. You've consistently downplayed this particular issue over the years- treated it as an irrelevance. You can take insult if you like - it wasn't meant that way. There's no shame in not understanding the level of poverty in a situation - most people don't. I didn't. But I really do not think you are aware of some of the deprivations affecting the community (or possibly around poverty in general), and I would ask you to consider researching this for your information.
However, you well know 'victimhood mode' is a way of denoting that you think people who disagree with your 'solution' are playing a victim, usually manipulatively, or have some personal need to be a 'victim'. It's rather classic ad hominem, it plays on psychiatric misrepresentations of people, and either way, it's deliberately placed to place my motivations in a bad (and wholly incorrect) light.
The points I'm making about money are EXACTLY the same as 'energy poor'. People are exhorted to chase their tails and criticised when they can't, or they think the proposed solution is futile, or problematic.
Your "if you can't give solutions you can't raise objections" argument is a false premise. It's a red herring. Identifying problems is the first step towards finding solutions. If everyone who didn't have a solution didn't dare raise a problem (which is where your logic has taken this!), AIDS research would never progress for one thing! AIDS wouldn't have even been identified. All the scientists would fear to raise the problem because they weren't 'solution-focused' because they didn't know how to cure it...!
And your own 'solution' is problematic. No other way around it.
But, in your scenario, the saviour of solutions meets the victim role adopter. Amazing.