About this thread On the main P2P thread, I listed points that we might like to write in about, both to praise what we like and to get changed those things that we don't. This is a resource-only thread to support that effort. Please don't post discussion here - that's for the main thread. Please only post here if you've adopted a particular point: your should only make one post about that point, in the format described below. You can always edit it later if the material is incomplete. The idea is that anyone can come to this thread and see a single post - not a series by different people - that pulls together what they need to respond to any one of the main points in relation to the P2P draft. The format should be as in the fourth post on this thread, where I give an example. That is: (a) the specific recommendation that we're making, in bold; (b) the line numbers where the key text occurs in the draft report, with it quoted; (c) any relevant facts,citations and/or key arguments. Edit: My line numbers are based on the 403-line version of the document.