1. Patients launch $1.27 million crowdfunding campaign for ME/CFS gut microbiome study.
    Check out the website, Facebook and Twitter. Join in donate and spread the word!
Ergonomics and ME/CFS: Have You Hurt Yourself Without Knowing It?
Having a chronic illness like ME/CFS can make it hard to avoid problems that come from bad ergonomics. Jody Smith has learned some lessons the hard way ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Potassium Arsenite 0.05% Cures CFS in Falcons, so what about humans?

Discussion in 'XMRV Testing, Treatment and Transmission' started by CFS-FIBRO-LYME, Jan 21, 2011.

  1. CFS-FIBRO-LYME

    CFS-FIBRO-LYME

    Messages:
    49
    Likes:
    16
    Houston, Texas U.S.A
    There's an article from 2004 about a vet who treated falcons diagnosed with CFS with Potassium Arsenite 0.05% leading to complete remission of symptoms in 97%.

    I'm assuming since this is an arsenic compound it's probably toxic in high doses and don't know how the diagnosis of CFS in birds is accomplished, but has anyone tried this and can humans even safely ingest such a compound in sufficient dosage?

    Here's the article:
    http://www.cfsresearch.org/cfs/tarello/cfs-treatment-falcons.htm

    There's more articles by the same vet using the same compound on other animals with good results found here:

    http://www.cfsresearch.org/cfs/tarello/
  2. Jemal

    Jemal Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes:
    60
    Arsenic compounds are toxic in humans, even in low doses. It damages the liver and can cause cancers. A few grains of arsenic can kill a human. So this is not something to experiment with I think or take lightly.

    Anyway, while Googling I noticed there is an FDA approved drug that has arsenic compounds and it's used to treat Leukemia, see:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenic_trioxide

    It triggers cancer cells to commit suicide (apoptosis). In theory I could see a connection with CFS, maybe killing infected (XMRV?) cells.

    It's interesting that falcons can also get CFS. I am wondering if it can be compared with CFS in humans though.
    Wouldn't it be something if they got CFS, because mice are an important part of their dinner? This is wildly speculative of course...
  3. ukxmrv

    ukxmrv Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes:
    1,944
    London
    CFS patients (human) did go to see Tarello in Italy. The only ones that I knew we not cured by his supplements. Sadly I lost track of what he was doing after that.
  4. August59

    August59 Daughters High School Graduation

    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes:
    405
    Upstate SC, USA
  5. CFS-FIBRO-LYME

    CFS-FIBRO-LYME

    Messages:
    49
    Likes:
    16
    Houston, Texas U.S.A
    Thanks guys for the update. I figured someone had already tried it.

    The old standby is arsenic...we killed the disease and the patient is cured!......Unfortunately, the patient is now also dead;-)

    Makes you wonder if the animals actually got better or simply started acting well because they knew if they didn't they'd get another dose of arsenic....
  6. acer2000

    acer2000 Senior Member

    Messages:
    577
    Likes:
    216
    I have read that arsenic, AZT, and interferon can put adult T cell leukemia caused by HTLV into remission. What the side effects or long term effects on the patient I am not aware of. Its interesting, but the devil is in the details.
  7. Francelle

    Francelle Senior Member

    Messages:
    444
    Likes:
    15
    Victoria, Australia
    Very funny!

    I wonder how a certain gentleman of the psychiatrict persuasion would interpret that?
  8. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes:
    2,797
    I have been doing some research on Dr Walter Tarello's use of arsenic salts to cure CFS caused by Staphylococcus bacteria, which worked in humans and animals, and have tried to do some rough calculations for the potential risks involved in taking arsenic salts.

    The info I found is here (in a thread on the Mind and Muscle forum, but you can of course post here too if you want to add anything more).
  9. ukxmrv

    ukxmrv Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes:
    1,944
    London
    I had a quick look at the link, Hip. It's mainly on gut bacteria for anyone interested in that topic. Not really on Tarello. Also doesn't mention anyone actually cured or helped by this theory. Patients with CFS did go to see him and were not cured (this was not mentioned in the separate discussion). No point really having long discussions on a topic if the cure doesn't work?
  10. 5vforest

    5vforest

    Messages:
    6
    Likes:
    1
    Not many things can make me laugh these days, but for some reason, imagining a falcon with CFS worked quite well.
  11. Hip

    Hip Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,962
    Likes:
    2,797
    I think the arsenic salts treatment is designed for Staphylococcus-associated CFS, which is what Dr Tarello had (from Staphylococcus bacteremia), so perhaps the CFS patients that went to see Dr Tarello but did not get helped had CFS caused by other pathogens?

    I cannot find any further studies detailing the people with CFS that Dr Tarello treated, and don't know what sort of pathogens these people may have carried in their bodies, and whether they had Staphylococcus or not. Do you know of anyone with this sort of info for the people he treated? I couldn't find anything.

    I have Staphylococcus aureus in my gut (detected via stool analysis), so it is possible that Staphylococcus and its very potent cytotoxins contribute to my CFS symptoms, which is why this treatment interest me, and it may interest others that know they have internal Staphylococcus infections. I am just concerned about possible risks.

    The stuff I posted on the Mind and Muscle forum was a kind of very rough risk assessment regarding the carcinogenic potential of arsenic - but there is lots of other general discussion on that thread, so I am going to cut and paste my stuff from that forum, and put the most relevant info about this risk assessment below (if you think this assessment might be wrong, please let me know; it is just to get a ballpark figure).

    The risk I calculated finally was: that arsenic CFS treatment will increase your lifetime risk of cancer from arsenic from 1 in 500 (which you have already if you live in the US/Europe due to environmental arsenic exposure), to perhaps something around 1 in 400, or 1 in 300.


    •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

    Veterinary surgeon Dr Walter Tarello has used arsenic compounds to cure both animals, and humans, of chronic fatigue syndrome.

    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11561958
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15129582
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11131041
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12688127
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11440190

    He used injections of either potassium arsenite, or sodium thiacetarsamide. I have read that arsenic trioxide should work also, and would be safer.

    Generally the CFS symptoms in these animals were due to Staphylococcus bacteremia. Staphylococcus is a difficult bacterium to eradicate; the newest research shows that Staphylococcus can change into an intracellular form, in order hide away from the immune system (and antibiotics) inside cells; but seemingly, these arsenic compounds eradicated this bacterium.

    The human CFS cases treated were Dr Tarello himself, and his wife. They both were handling animals with CFS fromStaphylococcus infection, and caught this infection themselves, and both developed CFS, but they decided to use the arsenic compound treatment on themselves - and thereby achieved full remission from CFS.

    Staphylococcus has long been linked to human CFS, probably as a co-infection that increases the CFS viral symptoms. Evidence for Staphylococcal involvement in human CFS comes from experiments with Staphylococcus toxoid vaccine (which increases the immune response against Staphylococcus): when given to CFS patients, this vaccine provided significant improvement in symptoms (ref: 1) - provided that this vaccine was given regularly. The fact that this vaccine has to be regularly re-adminsted indicates that the vaccine does not clear the Staphylococcus, it just helps the immune system to better control this bacterium.

    Given that Staphylococcus bacteria pump out a whole array of very nasty toxins, including alpha toxin (alpha-hemolysin), which is responsible for the fatalities of toxic shock syndrome that sometimes arise from tampon use. Alpha toxin makes pores in your cellular membranes, which causes lots of problems for the cells.

    Thus Staphylococcus toxins may well be contributing factors to CFS pathology.

    My guess is that other pathogens, typically immunosuppressive viruses (such as HHV-6A, enterovirus, XMRV) will weaken the immune system and allow Staphylococcus to proliferate more, so that there will be higher levels of Staphylococcus toxins going around in the body.

    Of course, not everyone will have Staphylococcus in their body; so this treatment does not apply to all cases of CFS. This study that indicates that 7.2% of people in the general population have Staphylococcus aureus in their intestines, and out of those positive samples, 14.6% was the methicillin-resistant variety of Staphylococcus (MRSA). My feeling is that if you do have Staphylococcus in your guts (a stool analysis will tell you if you have), and you have these immunosuppressive viruses, then Staphylococcus may well be contributing to your CFS symptoms.

    Might it be that arsenic compounds can completely eliminate Staphylococcus from the body (not an easy task), and so provide significant amelioration of CFS symptoms?

    The problem is that there is a carcinogenicity question mark over human use of arsenic compounds (apparently animals are much less susceptible to the carcinogenic effects of arsenic compounds than humans); although arsenic has also been used as a cancer treatment.

    Some general info on arsenic is here: http://phys4.harvard.edu/~wilson/arsenic/arsenic_project_health_effects.html

    •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

    Here are some snippets regarding the toxicity considerations of arsenic compounds:

    The recent article " Complete Remission After Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with Arsenic Trioxide" shows that moderate to high doses of arsenic given fora period of 30 days can cure leukemia. It is important to realizethat this is not in contradiction to the evidence that arsenic given at low doses for 15 years or more can produce high cancer rates (i.e.. kidney, bladder, lung). The doses given for leukemia cures were for about 30 days and the accumulated doses were about 300 mg. By way of comparison a person drinking 2 liters of water a day for20 years with 500 g/litre of arsenic (as was the case in Chile) will accumulate 7500 mg - 20 times more. So if the accumalated dose is the criterion for developing cancer, as is strongly believed, there should be no problem with the doses given for curative purposes. (Ref: 1)

    Medicinal uses of arsenicals: Inorganic arsenic has been used in medicine for over 2500 years. The most widely used form was Fowler solution containing 1% potassium arsenite, which was used for treatment of psoriasis. Arsphenamine was for many years the standard treatment for syphilis. Melarsoprol is an organoarsenic compound used to treat infections caused by Trypanosoma brucei or Trypanosoma gambiense. Retrospective studies have suggested an increase in the incidence of hepatic angiosarcoma in people previously treated with Fowler solution, but evidence is tentative. Regular, long-term arsenic exposure has been associated with various cutaneous carcinomas as well as internal malignancies including bronchogenic carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma
    . (Ref: 1)[/I]

    The first snippet above suggests that there should be no problem with moderate to high doses of arsenic given for short periods (30 days), and that it is mainly long term exposure (many decades) to arsenic compounds that, form this accumulated dose, may cause cancer.

    The second snippet above hints that there may possibly be some dangers of increased risk of cancer, even with with short term dosing.

    Note that the human CFS treatment used low dose intramuscular injection of potassium arsenite 0.5% for 10 days (1 ml/12 h), which I think works out to 5 mg of potassium arsenite every 12 hours, therefore a total of 100 mg of potassium arsenite for the whole 10 day CFS treatment.

    Since potassium arsenite contains 51 % of elemental arsenic (by a molecular weight calculation), this means there is a total of 51 mg of elemental arsenic for the whole CFS treatment described above.

    By comparison, US and European drinking water levels of arsenic comply with the standard of 10 parts per billion maximum (which works out to 10 μg of arsenic per liter). So 30 years of drinking 2 liters a day of this water will accumulate around 110 mg of arsenic in your body.

    Note: some types of rice have a lot of arsenic, like American long grain rice which has 26 μg of arsenic per 100 gram portion of rice (ref: 2). So if you have a lot of this rice in your diet (say one 100 gram portion a day on average), your daily arsenic intake will be 10 μg + 26 μg = 36 μg.

    So this CFS treatment that gives you an extra 51 mg of arsenic will increase your total accumulated body load of arsenic from 110 mg to 161 mg.

    This website on arsenic in drinking water gives the lifetime risks of getting cancer from arsenic in tap water. As you can see, the risk increases as the concentration of arsenic in the water in part per billion (ppb) increases.

    Arsenic Level . . . . . . Approximate Lifetime Cancer
    in Tap Water . . . . . . Risk From Arsenic in Drinking Water

    0.5 ppb . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 10,000
    1 ppb . . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 5,000
    3 ppb . . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 1,667
    4 ppb . . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 1,250
    5 ppb . . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 1,000
    10 ppb . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 500
    20 ppb . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 250
    25 ppb . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 200
    50 ppb . . . . . . . . . . 1 in 100

    So at present water supply levels of arsenic at 10 ppb, you already have a 1 in 500 lifetime chance of cancer from the arsenic in water.

    By taking the above CFS treatment on top of that, this would increase your lifetime arsenic levels a bit, and so make the risk a little more.

    In summary, as a guide, the arsenic CFS treatment will increase your lifetime risk of cancer from arsenic from 1 in 500 (which you have already if you live in the US/Europe), to perhaps something around 1 in 400, or 1 in 300.

    This is of course assuming that there are no extra carcinogenic effects arising from an acute higher level exposure to arsenic during treatment; that is to say, the calculation assumes that it is only the total body accumulation of arsenic that counts, as is often assumed.
    cigana likes this.
  12. ukxmrv

    ukxmrv Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes:
    1,944
    London
    Thanks for such a long detailed reply, Hip!

    I've printed it off to digest it in small chunks. Do you know if anyone has been able to track down Walter Tarello? The last I heard he was somewhere in the middle east but that was years ago.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page